-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
JDK-8325743: test/jdk/java/nio/channels/unixdomain/SocketOptions.java enhance user name output in error case #17829
Conversation
👋 Welcome back mbaesken! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since this is a test the proposed changes look reasonable to me. @Michael-Mc-Mahon may have more comments. You may want to consider adding a line break to avoid long lines.
@MBaesken This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static void testPeerCred() throws Exception { | |||
// Check returned user name | |||
|
|||
if (!s1.equals(s2)) { | |||
throw new RuntimeException("wrong username"); | |||
throw new RuntimeException("wrong username, we got " + s1 + " but property user.name is " + s2); | |||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It might be better to use "expected" and "actual" instead of "we got" :-)
I assume you'll bump the copyright header before integrating.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, I adjusted the header and also the output.
Added a line break.
Btw. in some other places we happily print the user name/id in the exception (even in src not test !). leads to (tested running jdk21u-dev), the user name seems to be messed up because of the bad LDAP we had on the test system, that's why only the id shows up in the exception |
Thanks for the reviews ! /integrate |
Going to push as commit d003996.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
In case of a bad running LDAP we got this output from test test/jdk/java/nio/channels/unixdomain/SocketOptions.java
java.lang.RuntimeException: wrong username
at SocketOptions.testPeerCred(SocketOptions.java:75)
at SocketOptions.main(SocketOptions.java:52)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(DirectMethodHandleAccessor.java:103)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:580)
at com.sun.javatest.regtest.agent.MainWrapper$MainTask.run(MainWrapper.java:138)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1583)
It would be better to see the compared values (user name data we compare) and get them in the exception output.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17829/head:pull/17829
$ git checkout pull/17829
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/17829
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17829/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 17829
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 17829
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17829.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment