Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JDK-8325743: test/jdk/java/nio/channels/unixdomain/SocketOptions.java enhance user name output in error case #17829

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

MBaesken
Copy link
Member

@MBaesken MBaesken commented Feb 13, 2024

In case of a bad running LDAP we got this output from test test/jdk/java/nio/channels/unixdomain/SocketOptions.java

java.lang.RuntimeException: wrong username
at SocketOptions.testPeerCred(SocketOptions.java:75)
at SocketOptions.main(SocketOptions.java:52)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(DirectMethodHandleAccessor.java:103)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:580)
at com.sun.javatest.regtest.agent.MainWrapper$MainTask.run(MainWrapper.java:138)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1583)

It would be better to see the compared values (user name data we compare) and get them in the exception output.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8325743: test/jdk/java/nio/channels/unixdomain/SocketOptions.java enhance user name output in error case (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17829/head:pull/17829
$ git checkout pull/17829

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/17829
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17829/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 17829

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 17829

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17829.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 13, 2024

👋 Welcome back mbaesken! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 13, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 13, 2024

@MBaesken The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • nio

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the nio nio-dev@openjdk.org label Feb 13, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 13, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@dfuch dfuch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since this is a test the proposed changes look reasonable to me. @Michael-Mc-Mahon may have more comments. You may want to consider adding a line break to avoid long lines.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 13, 2024

@MBaesken This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8325743: test/jdk/java/nio/channels/unixdomain/SocketOptions.java enhance user name output in error case

Reviewed-by: dfuchs, alanb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 13d9e8f: 8325590: Regression in round-tripping UTF-16 strings after JDK-8311906
  • 57b04e1: 8325748: Serial: Move Generation::promote to TenuredGeneration
  • 7cd25ed: 8322854: Incorrect rematerialization of scalar replaced objects in C2

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 13, 2024
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static void testPeerCred() throws Exception {
// Check returned user name

if (!s1.equals(s2)) {
throw new RuntimeException("wrong username");
throw new RuntimeException("wrong username, we got " + s1 + " but property user.name is " + s2);
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It might be better to use "expected" and "actual" instead of "we got" :-)

I assume you'll bump the copyright header before integrating.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, I adjusted the header and also the output.
Added a line break.

@MBaesken
Copy link
Member Author

MBaesken commented Feb 13, 2024

Since this is a test the proposed changes look reasonable to me. @Michael-Mc-Mahon may have more comments. You may want to consider adding a line break to avoid long lines.

Btw. in some other places we happily print the user name/id in the exception (even in src not test !).
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blame/master/src/java.base/unix/classes/sun/nio/fs/UnixUserPrincipals.java#L144

leads to (tested running jdk21u-dev), the user name seems to be messed up because of the bad LDAP we had on the test system, that's why only the id shows up in the exception
java.io.IOException: 3199:
at java.base/sun.nio.fs.UnixUserPrincipals.lookupName(UnixUserPrincipals.java:145)
at java.base/sun.nio.fs.UnixUserPrincipals.lookupUser(UnixUserPrincipals.java:167)
at java.base/sun.nio.fs.UnixFileSystem$LookupService$1.lookupPrincipalByName(UnixFileSystem.java:361)
at CheckPermissions.main(CheckPermissions.java:775)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(DirectMethodHandleAccessor.java:103)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:580)
at com.sun.javatest.regtest.agent.MainWrapper$MainTask.run(MainWrapper.java:138)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1583)

@MBaesken
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for the reviews !

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 14, 2024

Going to push as commit d003996.
Since your change was applied there have been 13 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 14, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 14, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 14, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 14, 2024

@MBaesken Pushed as commit d003996.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated nio nio-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants