Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8325730: StringBuilder.toString allocation for the empty String #17931

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

cl4es
Copy link
Member

@cl4es cl4es commented Feb 20, 2024

JDK-8282429 accidentally removed an optimization (JDK-8240094) that ensured StringBuilder/StringBuffer::toString returns "" when the builders are empty.

Name                         Cnt     Base      Error   Test   Error   Unit  Change
StringBuffers.emptyToString    5   12,289 ±    0,384  9,883 ± 0,721  ns/op   1,24x (p = 0,000*)
  :gc.alloc.rate                 1862,398 ±   57,647  0,007 ± 0,000 MB/sec   0,00x (p = 0,000*)
  :gc.alloc.rate.norm              24,000 ±    0,000  0,000 ± 0,000   B/op   0,00x (p = 0,000*)
  :gc.count                        31,000             0,000         counts
  :gc.time                         21,000                               ms
StringBuilders.emptyToString   5    4,146 ±    0,567  0,646 ± 0,003  ns/op   6,42x (p = 0,000*)
  :gc.alloc.rate                 9208,656 ± 1234,399  0,007 ± 0,000 MB/sec   0,00x (p = 0,000*)
  :gc.alloc.rate.norm              40,000 ±    0,000  0,000 ± 0,000   B/op   0,00x (p = 0,000*)
  :gc.count                        96,000             0,000         counts
  :gc.time                         64,000                               ms
  * = significant

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8325730: StringBuilder.toString allocation for the empty String (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17931/head:pull/17931
$ git checkout pull/17931

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/17931
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17931/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 17931

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 17931

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17931.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 20, 2024

👋 Welcome back redestad! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 20, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 20, 2024

@cl4es The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Feb 20, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 20, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@JimLaskey JimLaskey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 20, 2024

@cl4es This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8325730: StringBuilder.toString allocation for the empty String

Reviewed-by: jlaskey, shade

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • b419e95: 8294148: Support JSplitPane for instructions and test UI
  • 9538f5d: 8319651: Several network tests ignore vm flags when start java process
  • 4957d6a: 8325441: IGV: update pom.xml such that IntelliJ can import as maven project

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 20, 2024
Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, so before JDK-8282429 this was handled by String{Latin1|UTF16}.newString, gotcha.

@cl4es
Copy link
Member Author

cl4es commented Feb 20, 2024

Thanks!

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 20, 2024

Going to push as commit d2590c6.
Since your change was applied there have been 5 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • aa792ea: 8164094: javadoc allows to create a @link to a non-existent method
  • a2d027e: 8326089: Text incorrectly placed in breadcrumbs list in generated docs
  • b419e95: 8294148: Support JSplitPane for instructions and test UI
  • 9538f5d: 8319651: Several network tests ignore vm flags when start java process
  • 4957d6a: 8325441: IGV: update pom.xml such that IntelliJ can import as maven project

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 20, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 20, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 20, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 20, 2024

@cl4es Pushed as commit d2590c6.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants