Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8325754: Dead AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionNodes survive minor garbage collections #17950

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

viktorklang-ora
Copy link
Contributor

@viktorklang-ora viktorklang-ora commented Feb 21, 2024

More aggressively breaking chains in order to prevent nodes promoted to older generations standing in the way for collecting younger nodes. I decided that it was most efficient to add this logic to the else-branch of updating the firstWaiter and lastWaiter.

There's a race with unlinkCancelledWaiters() but according to @DougLea it should be a benign one.

There's a performance impact of this, but as it is a plain write, and one to null at that, it should be acceptable.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8325754: Dead AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionNodes survive minor garbage collections (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17950/head:pull/17950
$ git checkout pull/17950

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/17950
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17950/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 17950

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 17950

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17950.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 21, 2024

👋 Welcome back vklang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 21, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 21, 2024

@viktorklang-ora The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Feb 21, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 21, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@AlanBateman AlanBateman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If the race with unlinking non-waiting nodes is benign then this should be okay.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 22, 2024

@viktorklang-ora This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8325754: Dead AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionNodes survive minor garbage collections

Reviewed-by: alanb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 43 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 22, 2024
@DougLea
Copy link
Contributor

DougLea commented Feb 26, 2024

Thanks for doing this. Looks good.

@viktorklang-ora
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 27, 2024

Going to push as commit 60cbf29.
Since your change was applied there have been 93 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 27, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 27, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 27, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 27, 2024

@viktorklang-ora Pushed as commit 60cbf29.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants