-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8326612: Parallel: remove redundant assertion from ScavengeRootsTask #17994
8326612: Parallel: remove redundant assertion from ScavengeRootsTask #17994
Conversation
👋 Welcome back rrich! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since old_gen
is already dereferenced in the initializer list, the code would already crash before reaching this assert anyway, so it is useless.
You do need to file a CR and fix the title though until this can be moved along. |
@reinrich This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 61 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Thanks Thomas! I've done that now. |
Thanks for the reviews. |
Going to push as commit 0899b3b.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
This change removes a redundant assertion from
ScavengeRootsTask
.The assertion is redundant because
_old_gen
is initialized toold_gen
at L296 which is dereferenced at L297 before the assertion is reached.Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17994/head:pull/17994
$ git checkout pull/17994
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/17994
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17994/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 17994
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 17994
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17994.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment