Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8326763: Consolidate print methods in ContiguousSpace #18022

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

albertnetymk
Copy link
Member

@albertnetymk albertnetymk commented Feb 27, 2024

Trivial inlining and removing some unused methods.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8326763: Consolidate print methods in ContiguousSpace (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/18022/head:pull/18022
$ git checkout pull/18022

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/18022
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/18022/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 18022

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 18022

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18022.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 27, 2024

👋 Welcome back ayang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8326763 8326763: Consolidate print methods in ContiguousSpace Feb 27, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 27, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 27, 2024

@albertnetymk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-gc

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org label Feb 27, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 27, 2024

Webrevs

(int) ((double) used() * 100 / capacity()));
}

void ContiguousSpace::print() const { print_on(tty); }
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is a common pattern in HotSpot to have a print() function that delegates to print_on(tty). I think this function should be kept.

Copy link
Member

@lgxbslgx lgxbslgx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

print_short_on(st);
st->print_cr(" [" PTR_FORMAT ", " PTR_FORMAT ", " PTR_FORMAT ")",
p2i(bottom()), p2i(top()), p2i(end()));
st->print_cr(" space %zuK, %3d%% used [" PTR_FORMAT ", " PTR_FORMAT ", " PTR_FORMAT ")",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not use the previous SIZE_FORMAT?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

%zu is shorter and easier to read, and it's widely used in new code; SIZE_FORMAT is used in old code when we didn't have %zu.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Got it. Thanks for your explanation.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 28, 2024

@albertnetymk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8326763: Consolidate print methods in ContiguousSpace

Reviewed-by: stefank, gli

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 25 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 41242cb: 8325762: Use PassFailJFrame.Builder.splitUI() in PrintLatinCJKTest.java
  • 5db50ac: 8326892: Remove unused PSAdaptiveSizePolicyResizeVirtualSpaceAlot develop flag
  • eb4b6fa: 8326590: Improve description of MarkStackSize[Max] flags
  • e7e8083: 8326781: G1ConcurrentMark::top_at_rebuild_start() should take a HeapRegion* not an uint
  • e6b3bda: 8326509: Clean up JNIEXPORT in Hotspot after JDK-8017234
  • 1ab6bd4: 8326135: Enhance adlc to report unused operands
  • 3b90ddf: 8326685: Linux builds not reproducible if two builds configured in different build folders
  • 9b1f1e5: 8326389: [test] improve assertEquals failure output
  • 6cad07c: 8325746: Refactor Loop Unswitching code
  • 4dd6c44: 8326529: JFR: Test for CompilerCompile events fails due to time out
  • ... and 15 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/5d3d40d962ece0395d1da233e1f8db3de826cb93...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 28, 2024
@albertnetymk
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for review.

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 28, 2024

Going to push as commit a93605f.
Since your change was applied there have been 25 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 41242cb: 8325762: Use PassFailJFrame.Builder.splitUI() in PrintLatinCJKTest.java
  • 5db50ac: 8326892: Remove unused PSAdaptiveSizePolicyResizeVirtualSpaceAlot develop flag
  • eb4b6fa: 8326590: Improve description of MarkStackSize[Max] flags
  • e7e8083: 8326781: G1ConcurrentMark::top_at_rebuild_start() should take a HeapRegion* not an uint
  • e6b3bda: 8326509: Clean up JNIEXPORT in Hotspot after JDK-8017234
  • 1ab6bd4: 8326135: Enhance adlc to report unused operands
  • 3b90ddf: 8326685: Linux builds not reproducible if two builds configured in different build folders
  • 9b1f1e5: 8326389: [test] improve assertEquals failure output
  • 6cad07c: 8325746: Refactor Loop Unswitching code
  • 4dd6c44: 8326529: JFR: Test for CompilerCompile events fails due to time out
  • ... and 15 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/5d3d40d962ece0395d1da233e1f8db3de826cb93...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 28, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 28, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 28, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 28, 2024

@albertnetymk Pushed as commit a93605f.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@albertnetymk albertnetymk deleted the trivial branch February 28, 2024 15:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants