Skip to content

Conversation

@albertnetymk
Copy link
Member

@albertnetymk albertnetymk commented Feb 29, 2024

Simplifying bitmap iterate logic in full-gc compaction to reduce possible outcomes callers must handle.

Test: tier1-6


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8327057: Parallel: Refactor ParMarkBitMap::iterate (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/18065/head:pull/18065
$ git checkout pull/18065

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/18065
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/18065/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 18065

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 18065

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18065.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 29, 2024

👋 Welcome back ayang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8327057 8327057: Parallel: Refactor ParMarkBitMap::iterate Feb 29, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 29, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 29, 2024

@albertnetymk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-gc

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org label Feb 29, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 29, 2024

Webrevs

if (range_beg < range_end && is_unmarked(range_beg)) {
// The range starts with dead space. Look for the next object, then fill.
// This must be the beginning of old/eden/from/to-space, so it's must be
// larger enough for a filler.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
// larger enough for a filler.
// large enough for a filler.

const idx_t cur_end = find_obj_end(cur_beg, search_end);
if (cur_end >= range_end) {
// The obj ends outside the range.
live_closure->set_source(bit_to_addr(cur_beg));
Copy link
Contributor

@tschatzl tschatzl Mar 1, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The caller of iterate expects live_closure->source() to be set at exit but the new code does not update it. It is in use in case of abnormal status.

This is not the case for the iterate taking two closures afaict, but nevertheless it seems part of the contract so it is surprising if some methods do and some do not.

The other changes seem to be okay.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@albertnetymk mentioned that do_addr of MarkAndUpdateClosure properly updates the source of the closure.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 1, 2024

@albertnetymk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8327057: Parallel: Refactor ParMarkBitMap::iterate

Reviewed-by: tschatzl, iwalulya

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 23 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Mar 1, 2024
@albertnetymk
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for review.

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 4, 2024

Going to push as commit 045eea1.
Since your change was applied there have been 29 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Mar 4, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Mar 4, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Mar 4, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 4, 2024

@albertnetymk Pushed as commit 045eea1.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@albertnetymk albertnetymk deleted the pgc-iterate-incomplete branch March 4, 2024 18:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants