-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8326915: NPE when a validating parser is restricted #18071
Conversation
👋 Welcome back joehw! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@JoeWang-Java The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
@JoeWang-Java This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 15 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
if (i > 0) { | ||
return uri.substring(i+1, uri.length()); | ||
return input.substring(i+1, input.length()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: the second argument is not needed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks. Fixed. Also replaced the test's method name with a proper name.
/integrate |
Going to push as commit a3d51d2.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@JoeWang-Java Pushed as commit a3d51d2. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Fix a NPE when a validating parser is restricted by the JDKCatalog resolve property. Also slightly improved the error msg with the catalog name.
Test: new test added
existing test CatalogSupport5 would fail without the Null check on ErrorReporter. It's a separate issue not covered by this fix.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/18071/head:pull/18071
$ git checkout pull/18071
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/18071
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/18071/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 18071
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 18071
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18071.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment