8327677: Parallel: Remove unused ParallelCompactData::clear

[albertnetymk]

Trivial removing dead code.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8327677: Parallel: Remove unused ParallelCompactData::clear (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

• Thomas Schatzl (@tschatzl - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/18166/head:pull/18166
$ git checkout pull/18166

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/18166
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/18166/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 18166

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 18166

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18166.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back ayang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@albertnetymk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• hotspot-gc

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (8b2a4097)

[tschatzl]

Trivial.

[openjdk]

@albertnetymk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8327677: Parallel: Remove unused ParallelCompactData::clear

Reviewed-by: tschatzl

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 1877a48: 8308745: ObjArrayKlass::allocate_objArray_klass may call into java while holding a lock
• 997e615: 8322943: runtime/CompressedOops/CompressedClassPointers.java fails on AIX
• 27a03e0: 8327218: Add an ability to specify modules which should have native access enabled

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[albertnetymk]

Thanks for review.

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 06f7bb5.
Since your change was applied there have been 3 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 1877a48: 8308745: ObjArrayKlass::allocate_objArray_klass may call into java while holding a lock
• 997e615: 8322943: runtime/CompressedOops/CompressedClassPointers.java fails on AIX
• 27a03e0: 8327218: Add an ability to specify modules which should have native access enabled

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@albertnetymk Pushed as commit 06f7bb5.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.