-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8328089: Automate javax/swing/JTable/4222153/bug4222153.java applet test #18275
Conversation
👋 Welcome back abhiscxk! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@kumarabhi006 The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { | ||
UIManager.setLookAndFeel("javax.swing.plaf.metal.MetalLookAndFeel"); | ||
Robot robot = new Robot(); | ||
robot.setAutoDelay(100); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Delay can be reduced to 50ms
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Delay can be reduced to 50ms
AutoDealy has been set to 100ms for many of the PRs. So, kept it as 100. Anyway, I will update to 50.
robot.delay(100); | ||
robot.waitForIdle(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since autodelay is already set you can remove the additional delay after key release or reduce it to a smaller number.
robot.delay(100); | |
robot.waitForIdle(); | |
robot.waitForIdle(); | |
robot.delay(20); |
robot.delay(100); | ||
robot.waitForIdle(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same here and usually it is waitForIdle() followed by delay().
robot.keyPress(KeyEvent.VK_TAB); | ||
robot.keyRelease(KeyEvent.VK_TAB); | ||
robot.waitForIdle(); | ||
robot.delay(20); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kumarabhi006 whitespace error detected at line#96.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changes look good.
@kumarabhi006 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 100 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
frame.setSize(200, 200); | ||
frame.setLocationRelativeTo(null); | ||
frame.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE); | ||
frame.setVisible(true); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess it is better to move frame initialization part into a separate method rather here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since the UI initialization was minimal, I kept it in main. Moved to separate method now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated changes look good.
/integrate |
Going to push as commit f6390e5.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@kumarabhi006 Pushed as commit f6390e5. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Conversion of manual applet test to automated test. CI testing is green. Link attached to JBS.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/18275/head:pull/18275
$ git checkout pull/18275
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/18275
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/18275/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 18275
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 18275
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18275.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment