-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8328382: Convert java/awt/FileDialog/FileDialogForPackages test to main #18360
Conversation
Convert test to a main based; Move test to an appropriate folder; Remove old files;
👋 Welcome back kizune! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@azuev-java This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 206 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
@azuev-java The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
frame.add(textScrollPane, BorderLayout.CENTER); | ||
|
||
fd = new FileDialog(new Frame(), "Open"); | ||
fd.setDirectory(APPLICATIONS_FOLDER); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
guess APPLICATION_FOLDER can be made local
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
With Alexander's suggestion all variables could be made local. Fixing that.
JScrollPane textScrollPane = new JScrollPane(textOutput); | ||
frame.add(textScrollPane, BorderLayout.CENTER); | ||
|
||
fd = new FileDialog(new Frame(), "Open"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is there any need to mix Swing and AWT components in the test? I guess you can use the JFrame already created
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually you don't need the textOutput, with recent changes you can add .logArea()
to the PassFailJFrame builder
and just use PassFailJFrame.log()
wherever you need it.
So this method can be changed to return a JButton
, and use it with splitUIBottom
/splitUIRight
instead of testUI
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, using the PassFailJFrame logger.
.instructions(instructions) | ||
.rows((int) instructions.lines().count() + 1) | ||
.columns(40) | ||
.testUI(FileDialogForPackages::initialize) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems the filedialog is obscuring the instruction and test window...I guess it will be good if you can use
position(PassFailJFrame.Position.TOP_LEFT_CORNER)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unfortunately i can not reposition the test instructions dialog and i got rid of the test window so newly created filedialog will block the instructions. Not sure i can find a reliable way to avoid that.
Made all variables local; Minor changes based on review comments;
/integrate |
Going to push as commit b7a51dd.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@azuev-java Pushed as commit b7a51dd. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Convert test to a main based;
Move test to an appropriate folder;
Remove old files;
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/18360/head:pull/18360
$ git checkout pull/18360
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/18360
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/18360/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 18360
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 18360
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18360.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment