Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8328366: Thread.setContextClassloader from thread in FJP commonPool task no longer works after JDK-8327501 #18374

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

viktorklang-ora
Copy link
Contributor

@viktorklang-ora viktorklang-ora commented Mar 19, 2024

This is a draft PR with a potential solution to 8328366 without regressing 8327501.

@DougLea To avoid regressions in the future, where would regression tests for this ideally be located?


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8328366: Thread.setContextClassloader from thread in FJP commonPool task no longer works after JDK-8327501 (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/18374/head:pull/18374
$ git checkout pull/18374

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/18374
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/18374/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 18374

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 18374

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18374.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 19, 2024

👋 Welcome back vklang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 19, 2024

@viktorklang-ora This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8328366: Thread.setContextClassloader from thread in FJP commonPool task no longer works after JDK-8327501

Reviewed-by: mchung, alanb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 223 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 4276d5c: 8329637: Apparent typo in java.security file property jdk.tls.keyLimits
  • 6382a12: 8326666: Remove the Java Management Extension (JMX) Subject Delegation feature
  • d90e5b5: 8329546: Assume sized integral types are available
  • f3db279: 8327410: Add hostname option for UL file names
  • 21867c9: 8313332: Simplify lazy jmethodID cache in InstanceKlass
  • b9da140: 8329594: G1: Consistent Titles to Thread Work Items.
  • a169c06: 8329580: Parallel: Remove VerifyObjectStartArray
  • 8efd7aa: 8328786: [AIX] move some important warnings/errors from trcVerbose to UL
  • f26e430: 8327110: Refactor create_bool_from_template_assertion_predicate() to separate class and fix identical cloning cases used for Loop Unswitching and Split If
  • e5e21a8: 8328702: C2: Crash during parsing because sub type check is not folded
  • ... and 213 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/f1c69ccadb83306d1bb4860ff460a253af99643c...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 19, 2024

@viktorklang-ora The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Mar 19, 2024
@viktorklang-ora viktorklang-ora marked this pull request as ready for review March 20, 2024 16:27
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Mar 20, 2024
@viktorklang-ora
Copy link
Contributor Author

@DougLea @AlanBateman Added a regression test to ForkJoinPool9Test. I think this is the fix we need. Please review.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Mar 20, 2024

Webrevs

@jerboaa
Copy link
Contributor

jerboaa commented Apr 4, 2024

Is there any update on this PR?

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 4, 2024
@jerboaa
Copy link
Contributor

jerboaa commented Apr 4, 2024

FWIW, I've tested this with the quarkus reproducer and a reproducer for the class load leak. They seem both to work with this patch.

Please be sure to mention the bug for the ThreadLocal follow-up. Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

@AlanBateman AlanBateman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The change looks okay. It's unfortunate we didn't catch this but you've added a test. As a general point, I hope these tasks that are running in the common pool (or any thread pool for that matter) are resetting the TCCL before they complete.

@viktorklang-ora
Copy link
Contributor Author

Follow-up issue regarding the clearing of the Thread Locals here: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8329701

@viktorklang-ora
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 4, 2024

Going to push as commit 28216aa.
Since your change was applied there have been 223 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 4276d5c: 8329637: Apparent typo in java.security file property jdk.tls.keyLimits
  • 6382a12: 8326666: Remove the Java Management Extension (JMX) Subject Delegation feature
  • d90e5b5: 8329546: Assume sized integral types are available
  • f3db279: 8327410: Add hostname option for UL file names
  • 21867c9: 8313332: Simplify lazy jmethodID cache in InstanceKlass
  • b9da140: 8329594: G1: Consistent Titles to Thread Work Items.
  • a169c06: 8329580: Parallel: Remove VerifyObjectStartArray
  • 8efd7aa: 8328786: [AIX] move some important warnings/errors from trcVerbose to UL
  • f26e430: 8327110: Refactor create_bool_from_template_assertion_predicate() to separate class and fix identical cloning cases used for Loop Unswitching and Split If
  • e5e21a8: 8328702: C2: Crash during parsing because sub type check is not folded
  • ... and 213 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/f1c69ccadb83306d1bb4860ff460a253af99643c...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 4, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 4, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 4, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 4, 2024

@viktorklang-ora Pushed as commit 28216aa.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants