-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8328366: Thread.setContextClassloader from thread in FJP commonPool task no longer works after JDK-8327501 #18374
Conversation
👋 Welcome back vklang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@viktorklang-ora This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 223 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
@viktorklang-ora The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
@DougLea @AlanBateman Added a regression test to ForkJoinPool9Test. I think this is the fix we need. Please review. |
Is there any update on this PR? |
FWIW, I've tested this with the quarkus reproducer and a reproducer for the class load leak. They seem both to work with this patch. Please be sure to mention the bug for the ThreadLocal follow-up. Thanks! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The change looks okay. It's unfortunate we didn't catch this but you've added a test. As a general point, I hope these tasks that are running in the common pool (or any thread pool for that matter) are resetting the TCCL before they complete.
Follow-up issue regarding the clearing of the Thread Locals here: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8329701 |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit 28216aa.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@viktorklang-ora Pushed as commit 28216aa. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
This is a draft PR with a potential solution to 8328366 without regressing 8327501.
@DougLea To avoid regressions in the future, where would regression tests for this ideally be located?
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/18374/head:pull/18374
$ git checkout pull/18374
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/18374
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/18374/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 18374
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 18374
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18374.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment