Skip to content

8328648: Remove applet usage from JFileChooser tests bug4150029#18415

Closed
alisenchung wants to merge 10 commits intoopenjdk:masterfrom
alisenchung:2024_spring_testsprint_8
Closed

8328648: Remove applet usage from JFileChooser tests bug4150029#18415
alisenchung wants to merge 10 commits intoopenjdk:masterfrom
alisenchung:2024_spring_testsprint_8

Conversation

@alisenchung
Copy link
Contributor

@alisenchung alisenchung commented Mar 20, 2024

Removing applet usage from manual JFileChooser tests


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8328648: Remove applet usage from JFileChooser tests bug4150029 (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/18415/head:pull/18415
$ git checkout pull/18415

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/18415
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/18415/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 18415

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 18415

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18415.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 20, 2024

👋 Welcome back achung! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 20, 2024

@alisenchung This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8328648: Remove applet usage from JFileChooser tests bug4150029

Reviewed-by: dnguyen, abhiscxk, honkar

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 38 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 3057dde: 8329421: Native methods can not be selectively printed
  • db15914: 8328753: Open source few Undecorated Frame tests
  • 925d829: 8329013: StackOverflowError when starting Apache Tomcat with signed jar
  • dd5d7d0: 8327002: (fs) java/nio/file/Files/CopyMoveVariations.java should be able to test across file systems
  • 6ae1cf1: 8329368: Generational ZGC: Remove the unnecessary friend classes in ZAllocator
  • 7eb78e3: 8320676: Manual printer tests have no Pass/Fail buttons, instructions close set 1
  • 5ac067f: 8329289: Unify SetupJdkExecutable and SetupJdkLibrary
  • 5ae849d: 8329292: Fix missing cleanups in java.management and jdk.management
  • ed821cb: 8324807: Manual printer tests have no Pass/Fail buttons, instructions close set 2
  • 5cf457b: 8329320: Simplify awt/print/PageFormat/NullPaper.java test
  • ... and 28 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/df01cc528d3b6e52925b92119e43caee54ec86e8...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Mar 20, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 20, 2024

@alisenchung The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • client

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Mar 20, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Mar 20, 2024

@kumarabhi006
Copy link
Contributor

This test can be converted to automated. Similar issue was resolved for GTK LAF. You can refer #11291.

Copy link
Contributor

@DamonGuy DamonGuy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like the test needs a headful tag as well. Was this ran via CI?

Copy link
Contributor

@kumarabhi006 kumarabhi006 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good now. Only point is "should we move this test outside folder as html file is deleted now?".
Hope you have tested in CI for all platform.

@alisenchung
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks good now. Only point is "should we move this test outside folder as html file is deleted now?". Hope you have tested in CI for all platform.

Clientlibs is green, also I'll keep this inside the folder for bookkeeping

@alisenchung
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 1, 2024

@alisenchung This pull request has not yet been marked as ready for integration.

@kumarabhi006
Copy link
Contributor

/integrate

You need a "Reviewer" approval to integrate.

Copy link
Contributor

@DamonGuy DamonGuy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed. Looks good now, especially if CI is green. Still need "R"eviewer approval.

Copy link
Contributor

@honkar-jdk honkar-jdk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 2, 2024
@alisenchung
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 2, 2024

Going to push as commit 021ed6a.
Since your change was applied there have been 38 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 3057dde: 8329421: Native methods can not be selectively printed
  • db15914: 8328753: Open source few Undecorated Frame tests
  • 925d829: 8329013: StackOverflowError when starting Apache Tomcat with signed jar
  • dd5d7d0: 8327002: (fs) java/nio/file/Files/CopyMoveVariations.java should be able to test across file systems
  • 6ae1cf1: 8329368: Generational ZGC: Remove the unnecessary friend classes in ZAllocator
  • 7eb78e3: 8320676: Manual printer tests have no Pass/Fail buttons, instructions close set 1
  • 5ac067f: 8329289: Unify SetupJdkExecutable and SetupJdkLibrary
  • 5ae849d: 8329292: Fix missing cleanups in java.management and jdk.management
  • ed821cb: 8324807: Manual printer tests have no Pass/Fail buttons, instructions close set 2
  • 5cf457b: 8329320: Simplify awt/print/PageFormat/NullPaper.java test
  • ... and 28 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/df01cc528d3b6e52925b92119e43caee54ec86e8...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 2, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 2, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 2, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 2, 2024

@alisenchung Pushed as commit 021ed6a.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

Comments