Skip to content

JDK-8328604: remove on_aix() function #18427

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

MBaesken
Copy link
Member

@MBaesken MBaesken commented Mar 21, 2024

The on_aix() function was added to distinguish "real" AIX and os400 PASE mode. But the os400 PASE was never supported in OpenJDK and there are no plans to do so.
So we can clean this up a bit and simplify the AIX coding.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/18427/head:pull/18427
$ git checkout pull/18427

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/18427
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/18427/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 18427

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 18427

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18427.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 21, 2024

👋 Welcome back mbaesken! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 21, 2024

@MBaesken This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8328604: remove on_aix() function

Reviewed-by: clanger, stuefe

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 4 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 7006790: 8328628: JDK-8328157 incorrectly sets -MT on all compilers in jdk.jpackage
  • 68170ae: 8328238: Convert few closed manual applet tests to main
  • 9f5ad43: 8320675: PrinterJob/SecurityDialogTest.java hangs
  • 684678f: 8328633: s390x: Improve vectorization of Match.sqrt() on floats

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Mar 21, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 21, 2024

@MBaesken The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-runtime

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org label Mar 21, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Mar 21, 2024

Webrevs

@tstuefe
Copy link
Member

tstuefe commented Mar 21, 2024

But the PASE port in OpenJDK is functional, right? If it was functional, someone may be using it. (I remember talking to IBMers who used OpenJDK on AS/400, but cannot remember if they built it themselves)

@MBaesken
Copy link
Member Author

But the PASE port in OpenJDK is functional, right? If it was functional, someone may be using it.

Never tested it, so I think it is unlikely that it is functional.

@RealCLanger
Copy link
Contributor

No, the OpenJDK port to AS/400 is not functional and I'm not aware of plans, e.g. from IBM, to change that. This cleanup is welcome, I'd say.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Mar 21, 2024
Copy link
Member

@tstuefe tstuefe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay then.

@MBaesken
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 22, 2024

Going to push as commit 940d196.
Since your change was applied there have been 34 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • d44aaa3: 8326643: JDK server does not send a dummy change_cipher_spec record after HelloRetryRequest message
  • 9bc741d: 8328339: Static import prevents source launcher from finding class with main method
  • 256d48b: 8327980: Convert javax/swing/JToggleButton/4128979/bug4128979.java applet test to main
  • 177b8a2: 8327840: Automate javax/swing/border/Test4129681.java
  • da00921: 8320404: Double whitespace in SubTypeCheckNode::dump_spec output
  • 4d36c4a: 8328285: GetOwnedMonitorInfo functions should use JvmtiHandshake
  • 0efd9dc: 8328398: Convert java/awt/im/4490692/bug4490692.html applet test to main
  • 46809b3: 8324736: Invalid end positions for EMPTY_STATEMENT
  • f7f291c: 8328301: Convert Applet test ManualHTMLDataFlavorTest.java to main program
  • 771f6a2: 8327704: Update nsk/jdi tests to use driver instead of othervm
  • ... and 24 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/93d1700f23d42cb35b6028c5d7d029c035711acf...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Mar 22, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Mar 22, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Mar 22, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 22, 2024

@MBaesken Pushed as commit 940d196.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants