Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8329354: java/text/Format/MessageFormat/CompactSubFormats.java fails #18557

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

DamonFool
Copy link
Member

@DamonFool DamonFool commented Mar 30, 2024

Hi all,

java/text/Format/MessageFormat/CompactSubFormats.java fails in our testing machines.
I'm not an expert in this area and just guess it can be fixed like this.
Please review it.

Thanks.
Best regards,
Jie


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8329354: java/text/Format/MessageFormat/CompactSubFormats.java fails (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/18557/head:pull/18557
$ git checkout pull/18557

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/18557
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/18557/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 18557

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 18557

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18557.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 30, 2024

👋 Welcome back jiefu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 30, 2024

@DamonFool This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8329354: java/text/Format/MessageFormat/CompactSubFormats.java fails

Reviewed-by: jlu, naoto

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 4 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 3f5b75a: 8328541: Remove or update obsolete comment in JRootPane
  • 1e76e1f: 8328403: Remove applet usage from JColorChooser tests Test6977726
  • 9d052e9: 8329131: Fold libjli_static back into libjli on AIX
  • f2e5808: 8329126: No native wrappers generated anymore with -XX:-TieredCompilation after JDK-8251462

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Mar 30, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 30, 2024

@DamonFool The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs
  • i18n

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org i18n i18n-dev@openjdk.org labels Mar 30, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Mar 30, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@justin-curtis-lu justin-curtis-lu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi Jie,

This is indeed the correct solution to ensure that the DecimalFormat, (specifically, the underlying DecimalFormatSymbols) has the same locale as the MessageFormat subformat.

Thank you for the fix, it LGTM

@DamonFool
Copy link
Member Author

This is indeed the correct solution to ensure that the DecimalFormat, (specifically, the underlying DecimalFormatSymbols) has the same locale as the MessageFormat subformat.

Thanks @justin-curtis-lu for the review.

@DamonFool
Copy link
Member Author

May I get one more review from a reviewer? Maybe @naotoj ?
Thanks.

Copy link
Member

@naotoj naotoj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks for the fix.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 1, 2024
@DamonFool
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @naotoj .
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 1, 2024

Going to push as commit ecd2b71.
Since your change was applied there have been 8 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • c2979c1: 8329425: ProblemList containers/docker/TestJFREvents.java on linux-x64
  • 5698f7a: 8329134: Reconsider TLAB zapping
  • 4a14cba: 8329213: Better validation for com.sun.security.ocsp.useget option
  • 9f5464e: 8329353: ResolvedReferencesNotNullTest.java failed with Incorrect resolved references array, quxString should not be archived
  • 3f5b75a: 8328541: Remove or update obsolete comment in JRootPane
  • 1e76e1f: 8328403: Remove applet usage from JColorChooser tests Test6977726
  • 9d052e9: 8329131: Fold libjli_static back into libjli on AIX
  • f2e5808: 8329126: No native wrappers generated anymore with -XX:-TieredCompilation after JDK-8251462

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 1, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 1, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 1, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 1, 2024

@DamonFool Pushed as commit ecd2b71.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@DamonFool DamonFool deleted the JDK-8329354 branch April 1, 2024 23:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org i18n i18n-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants