-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.1k
8329538: Accelerate P256 on x86_64 using Montgomery intrinsic #18583
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
17 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e36a552
rebase
vpaprotsk 6285a33
conditionalAssign intrinsic
vpaprotsk c431528
Address comments from Anas and thorough cleanup
vpaprotsk bc8d611
Fix rebase typo
vpaprotsk 7bf06b7
Remeasure performance
vpaprotsk dbe6cd3
remove trailing whitespace
vpaprotsk 82b6dae
remove use of jdk.crypto.ec
vpaprotsk 6f9ac04
Comments from Jatin and Tony
vpaprotsk c93a71f
Comments from Tony and Jatin
vpaprotsk a198450
whitespace
vpaprotsk 8ff243a
Use AffinePoint to exit Montgomery domain
vpaprotsk 1ecfdc4
whitespace
vpaprotsk 83b2131
add message back
vpaprotsk 8cd095d
whitespace
vpaprotsk 5c360e3
comments from Sandhya
vpaprotsk df4fe6f
shenandoah verifier
vpaprotsk b1a3300
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into ecc-montgomery
vpaprotsk File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems like there could be some combining of both
multiply(). Ifmultiply(AffinePoint, ...)is called, it can callDefaultMultiplierwith theaffineP, but internally call the othermultiply(ECPoint, ...)for the other situations. I'd rather not have two methods doing most of the same code, but different methods.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, they indeed look identical, didnt notice. Fixed. (repeated the same hashmap refactoring and didnt notice I produced identical code twice)