Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8330681: Explicit hashCode and equals for java.lang.runtime.SwitchBootstraps$TypePairs #18865

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

cl4es
Copy link
Member

@cl4es cl4es commented Apr 19, 2024

We can reduce overhead of first use of a switch bootstrap by moving typePairToName into TypePairs and by explicitly overriding hashCode and equals. The first change avoids loading and initializing the TypePairs class in actual cases, the second remove some excess code generation from happening on first use.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8330681: Explicit hashCode and equals for java.lang.runtime.SwitchBootstraps$TypePairs (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/18865/head:pull/18865
$ git checkout pull/18865

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/18865
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/18865/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 18865

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 18865

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18865.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 19, 2024

👋 Welcome back redestad! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 19, 2024

@cl4es This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8330681: Explicit hashCode and equals for java.lang.runtime.SwitchBootstraps$TypePairs

Reviewed-by: jlahoda, mchung

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 13 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 5313dcc: 8330733: Generational ZGC: Remove ZBarrier::verify_old_object_live_slow_path
  • 5394f57: 8330621: Make 5 compiler tests use ProcessTools.executeProcess
  • 20546c1: 8330004: Refactor cloning down code in Split If for Template Assertion Predicates
  • bd67ac6: 8329331: Intrinsify Unsafe::setMemory
  • 185e711: 8318650: Optimized subword gather for x86 targets.
  • 6d56996: 8330540: Rename the enum type CompileCommand to CompileCommandEnum
  • f6feeb0: 8330703: Improve link syntax in javax.lang.model.util
  • df04358: 8330179: Clean up non-standard use of /** comments in jdk.compiler
  • c1dd82b: 8329644: Discuss expected visitor evolution patterns in javax.lang.model.util
  • b704e91: 8329433: Reduce nmethod header size
  • ... and 3 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/177092b952c2135c6f6872c6b64d1e210452d35a...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 19, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 19, 2024

@cl4es The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Apr 19, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@lahodaj lahodaj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 19, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 19, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@mlchung mlchung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

}

public boolean equals(Object other) {
if (other instanceof TypePairs otherPair) {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To match the behaviour of the equals method body generated by java​.lang​.runtime​.ObjectMethods​::bootstrap, this should include a fast path check for this == other:

Suggested change
if (other instanceof TypePairs otherPair) {
if (this == other) {
return true;
}
if (other instanceof TypePairs otherPair) {

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kuzjX_efuDs; this fast path is faster for == matching case but significantly slows down all other branches.

@@ -684,13 +681,27 @@ else if (selectorType.equals(targetType) ||

// TypePairs should be in sync with the corresponding record in Lower
record TypePairs(Class<?> from, Class<?> to) {

private static final Map<TypePairs, String> typePairToName = initialize();

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If TypePairs.typePairToName is never modified after initialisation, then it should probably be made immutable:

Suggested change
private static final Map<TypePairs, String> typePairToName = initialize();
private static final Map<TypePairs, String> typePairToName = Map.copyOf(initialize());

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you really think about it, the initialize method itself is somewhat problematic, as it's initializing with byte/short/char on the left, all of which are already converted to int in the of() factory. This should be done in a separate issue.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, the "redirected" mappings can simply be removed in the current implementation.

Using Map.copyOf should be ok to nail down the read-only intent.

@cl4es
Copy link
Member Author

cl4es commented Apr 22, 2024

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 22, 2024

Going to push as commit 3d62bbf.
Since your change was applied there have been 13 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 5313dcc: 8330733: Generational ZGC: Remove ZBarrier::verify_old_object_live_slow_path
  • 5394f57: 8330621: Make 5 compiler tests use ProcessTools.executeProcess
  • 20546c1: 8330004: Refactor cloning down code in Split If for Template Assertion Predicates
  • bd67ac6: 8329331: Intrinsify Unsafe::setMemory
  • 185e711: 8318650: Optimized subword gather for x86 targets.
  • 6d56996: 8330540: Rename the enum type CompileCommand to CompileCommandEnum
  • f6feeb0: 8330703: Improve link syntax in javax.lang.model.util
  • df04358: 8330179: Clean up non-standard use of /** comments in jdk.compiler
  • c1dd82b: 8329644: Discuss expected visitor evolution patterns in javax.lang.model.util
  • b704e91: 8329433: Reduce nmethod header size
  • ... and 3 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/177092b952c2135c6f6872c6b64d1e210452d35a...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 22, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 22, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 22, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 22, 2024

@cl4es Pushed as commit 3d62bbf.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants