Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8330815: Use pattern matching for instanceof in KeepAliveCache #18885

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

RealCLanger
Copy link
Contributor

@RealCLanger RealCLanger commented Apr 22, 2024

In su.net.www.http.KeepAliveCache we could use pattern matching for instanceof.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8330815: Use pattern matching for instanceof in KeepAliveCache (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/18885/head:pull/18885
$ git checkout pull/18885

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/18885
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/18885/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 18885

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 18885

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18885.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 22, 2024

👋 Welcome back clanger! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 22, 2024

@RealCLanger This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8330815: Use pattern matching for instanceof in KeepAliveCache

Reviewed-by: jpai, djelinski

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 18 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 3bd6982: 8326150: Typo in the documentation for jdk.jshell
  • d9d926d: 8330145: Serial: Refactor SerialHeap::scan_evacuated_objs
  • 1a6da3d: 8330822: Remove ModRefBarrierSet::write_ref_array_work
  • 281f9bd: 8330735: RISC-V: No need to move sp to tmp register in set_last_Java_frame
  • daa5a4b: 8330802: Desugar switch in Locale::createLocale
  • 8961077: 8309259: Reduce calls to MethodHandles.lookup() in jdk.internal.net.http.Stream
  • 574ba14: 8330862: GCBarrierIRExample fails when a different GC is selected via the command line
  • 550a138: 8306928: Duplicate variable assignement in jdk.internal.net.http.AuthenticationFilter#getCredentials
  • 57ebd04: 8330153: C2: dump barrier information for all Mach nodes
  • 58ad399: 8330821: Rename UnsafeCopyMemory
  • ... and 8 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/3e185c70feef3febf75c58a5d4d394a4b772105f...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 22, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 22, 2024

@RealCLanger The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • net

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the net net-dev@openjdk.org label Apr 22, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 22, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@jaikiran jaikiran left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello Christoph, this cleanup change looks good to me.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 23, 2024
Copy link
Member

@djelinski djelinski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd prefer this instead:

        if (!(obj instanceof KeepAliveKey kae))
            return false;

because it's more awesome :) but what you propose looks good too.

@RealCLanger
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'd prefer this instead:

        if (!(obj instanceof KeepAliveKey kae))
            return false;

because it's more awesome :) but what you propose looks good too.

Yes, you're right. Adapted. 😄

@RealCLanger
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 25, 2024

Going to push as commit e818ab6.
Since your change was applied there have been 61 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • d43654e: 8331030: langtools/tools/javac/tree tests fail with SOE with fastdebug and -Xcomp
  • 21480a7: 8322135: Printing JTable in Windows L&F throws InternalError: HTHEME is null
  • e6118ce: 8331018: Clean up non-standard use of /** comments in jdk.jshell
  • a44ac02: 8330853: Add missing checks for ConnectionGraph::can_reduce_cmp() call
  • 8a8d928: 8330611: AES-CTR vector intrinsic may read out of bounds (x86_64, AVX-512)
  • 0014e0e: 8331061: Serial: Missed BOT update in TenuredGeneration::expand_and_allocate
  • ea3909a: 8331054: C2 MergeStores: assert failed: unexpected basic type after JDK-8318446 and JDK-8329555
  • 7b2560b: 8330849: Add test to verify memory usage with recursive locking
  • 25871af: 8328896: Fontmetrics for large Fonts has zero width
  • 1d06170: 8300148: Consider using a StoreStore barrier instead of Release barrier on ctor exit
  • ... and 51 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/3e185c70feef3febf75c58a5d4d394a4b772105f...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 25, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 25, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 25, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 25, 2024

@RealCLanger Pushed as commit e818ab6.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@RealCLanger RealCLanger deleted the JDK-8330815 branch April 25, 2024 06:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated net net-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants