8258961: move some fields of SafePointNode from public to protected #1899

navyxliu · 2020-12-28T09:48:29Z

Declare VMStructs is a friend of SafePointNode so we can move some fields from public zone to protected zone.
Clean up the forward declaration section in callnode.hpp. Lock/Unlock Nodes are subclasses of AbstractLockNode.

/cc hotspot-compiler

Progress

Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
Commit message must refer to an issue
Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

JDK-8258961: move some fields of SafePointNode from public to protected

Reviewers

Tobias Hartmann (@TobiHartmann - Reviewer)
Vladimir Kozlov (@vnkozlov - Reviewer)

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/1899/head:pull/1899
$ git checkout pull/1899

bridgekeeper · 2020-12-28T09:48:53Z

👋 Welcome back xliu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

openjdk · 2020-12-28T09:49:49Z

@navyxliu
The hotspot-compiler label was successfully added.

mlbridge · 2020-12-28T09:53:10Z

Webrevs

src/hotspot/share/opto/callnode.hpp

vnkozlov

Also update last copyright year in changed files.

src/hotspot/share/runtime/vmStructs.cpp

devirtualize SafePointNode::jvms(). We can't hide the member variable _jvms because it is exposed to HotSpot Servicability agent. keeping the qualifier const for the same resaon.

vnkozlov

Good.

openjdk · 2021-01-05T16:50:02Z

@navyxliu This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8258961: move some fields of SafePointNode from public to protected

Reviewed-by: thartmann, kvn

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 222 new commits pushed to the master branch:

6b4732f: 8259679: GitHub actions should use MSVC 14.28
061ffc4: 8249245: assert(((((JfrTraceIdBits::load(klass)) & ((JfrTraceIdEpoch::this_epoch_method_and_class_bits()))) != 0))) failed: invariant
e60c992: 8259849: Shenandoah: Rename store-val to IU-barrier
db9c114: 7146776: deadlock between URLStreamHandler.getHostAddress and file.Handler.openconnection
61292be: 8259681: Remove the Marlin rendering engine (single-precision)
ff275b3: 8259403: Zero: crash with NULL MethodHandle receiver
e93f08e: 8074101: Add verification that all tasks are actually claimed during roots processing
917f7e9: 8259650: javax/swing/JComponent/7154030/bug7154030.java still fails with "Exception: Failed to hide opaque button"
3f19ef6: 8202880: Test javax/swing/JPopupMenu/8075063/ContextMenuScrollTest.java fails
68cf65d: 8023980: JCE doesn't provide any class to handle RSA private key in PKCS#1
... and 212 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/8b4549773b649a33f8f6795cd054b4bb2ec607ec...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@TobiHartmann, @vnkozlov) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

navyxliu · 2021-01-05T19:55:34Z

I investigate the 3 failures on x86 host. they have been fixed in JDK-8258703 (committed yesterday).
Presumably, the regression tests are clear. /integrate.

navyxliu · 2021-01-05T20:43:56Z

/integrate

openjdk · 2021-01-05T20:44:41Z

@navyxliu
Your change (at version b42b468) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

TobiHartmann · 2021-01-06T06:56:36Z

/sponsor

openjdk · 2021-01-06T06:57:20Z

@TobiHartmann This PR has not yet been marked as ready for integration.

TobiHartmann · 2021-01-06T09:15:24Z

@navyxliu There is a title mismatch between the PR and the JBS issue that you need to fix before integration.

navyxliu · 2021-01-06T09:30:37Z

Yes, I did modify the JBS title. I found it's hard to hide out _jvms because offset_of(klass, field) needs to access the field.

I plan to see if we can use template metaprogramming or constexpr to workaround it(https://gist.github.com/graphitemaster/494f21190bb2c63c5516). I will file a separate issue if I figure out how.

navyxliu · 2021-01-08T17:30:20Z

I found Node::jvms() is virtual, so it's useless to remove keyword "virtual" in SafePointNode::jvms(). I need another revision to fix it.

Paul asked me to hide away those public fields into protected. I discover a straightforward solution -- just declare friend class VMStructs. Other classes do that.

remove the virtual qualifier from Node::jvms(). check its type is SafePointNode and MachSafePointNode instead. This patch also move some fiels to proctected zone and declare VMStructs is a friend.

revert code change to devirtualize Node::jvms(). There are 3 nodes override jvms() -- SafePointNode, MachSafePointNode and MachHalt. It does not make sense to devirtualize it because we have to do non-trivial dispatch based on types in Node::jvms(). It is not worth it.

navyxliu · 2021-01-15T17:53:52Z

I took back the devirtual attempt because it's not worth it. there're 3 nodes override Node::jvms().
non-virtual jvms() looks more expensive to access vtable.

JVMState* Node::jvms() const {
  if (is_SafePoint()) {
    return as_SafePoint()->jvms();
  } else if (is_MachSafePoint()) {
    return as_MachSafePoint()->jvms();
  } else if (is_MachHalt()) {
   return as_MachHalt()->jvms();
  }
  return nullptr;
}

navyxliu · 2021-01-15T22:41:00Z

/integrate

openjdk · 2021-01-15T22:41:52Z

@navyxliu
Your change (at version cdac2d7) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

navyxliu · 2021-01-15T22:43:20Z

hello, @TobiHartmann ,
Could you take a look at this PR again? I've corrected title and description to reflect what this patch does.

TobiHartmann

Looks reasonable to me but @vnkozlov should also review this again.

vnkozlov

Looks good.

Latest version passed hs-tier1-3 testing.

vnkozlov · 2021-01-18T22:32:45Z

/sponsor

openjdk · 2021-01-18T22:34:20Z

@vnkozlov @navyxliu Since your change was applied there have been 222 commits pushed to the master branch:

6b4732f: 8259679: GitHub actions should use MSVC 14.28
061ffc4: 8249245: assert(((((JfrTraceIdBits::load(klass)) & ((JfrTraceIdEpoch::this_epoch_method_and_class_bits()))) != 0))) failed: invariant
e60c992: 8259849: Shenandoah: Rename store-val to IU-barrier
db9c114: 7146776: deadlock between URLStreamHandler.getHostAddress and file.Handler.openconnection
61292be: 8259681: Remove the Marlin rendering engine (single-precision)
ff275b3: 8259403: Zero: crash with NULL MethodHandle receiver
e93f08e: 8074101: Add verification that all tasks are actually claimed during roots processing
917f7e9: 8259650: javax/swing/JComponent/7154030/bug7154030.java still fails with "Exception: Failed to hide opaque button"
3f19ef6: 8202880: Test javax/swing/JPopupMenu/8075063/ContextMenuScrollTest.java fails
68cf65d: 8023980: JCE doesn't provide any class to handle RSA private key in PKCS#1
... and 212 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/8b4549773b649a33f8f6795cd054b4bb2ec607ec...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit 533a2d3.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

navyxliu · 2021-01-18T22:42:17Z

Thanks for all reviewers.

8258961: devirtualize SafePointNode::jvms() and hide out set_jvms()

bdbeda1

openjdk bot added rfr Pull request is ready for review hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org labels Dec 28, 2020

TobiHartmann suggested changes Jan 4, 2021

View reviewed changes

src/hotspot/share/opto/callnode.hpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

vnkozlov suggested changes Jan 4, 2021

View reviewed changes

src/hotspot/share/runtime/vmStructs.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

8258961: devirtualize SafePointNode::jvms() and hide out set_jvms()

b42b468

devirtualize SafePointNode::jvms(). We can't hide the member variable _jvms because it is exposed to HotSpot Servicability agent. keeping the qualifier const for the same resaon.

vnkozlov approved these changes Jan 5, 2021

View reviewed changes

openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 5, 2021

openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Jan 5, 2021

openjdk bot removed sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored ready Pull request is ready to be integrated labels Jan 5, 2021

TobiHartmann approved these changes Jan 6, 2021

View reviewed changes

Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8258961

f393855

navyxliu changed the title ~~8258961: devirtualize SafePointNode::jvms() and hide out set_jvms()~~ 8258961: devirtualize SafePointNode::jvms() Jan 6, 2021

openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 6, 2021

Xin Liu added 2 commits January 9, 2021 00:36

8258961: devirtualize SafePointNode::jvms()

44d7b8e

remove the virtual qualifier from Node::jvms(). check its type is SafePointNode and MachSafePointNode instead. This patch also move some fiels to proctected zone and declare VMStructs is a friend.

openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 15, 2021

navyxliu changed the title ~~8258961: devirtualize SafePointNode::jvms()~~ 8258961: move some fields of SafePointNode from public to protected Jan 15, 2021

openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 15, 2021

openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Jan 15, 2021

TobiHartmann approved these changes Jan 18, 2021

View reviewed changes

vnkozlov approved these changes Jan 18, 2021

View reviewed changes

openjdk bot closed this Jan 18, 2021

openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 18, 2021

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

8258961: move some fields of SafePointNode from public to protected #1899

8258961: move some fields of SafePointNode from public to protected #1899

navyxliu commented Dec 28, 2020 •

edited by openjdk bot

Loading

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 28, 2020

openjdk bot commented Dec 28, 2020

mlbridge bot commented Dec 28, 2020 •

edited

Loading

vnkozlov left a comment

vnkozlov left a comment

openjdk bot commented Jan 5, 2021 •

edited

Loading

navyxliu commented Jan 5, 2021

navyxliu commented Jan 5, 2021

openjdk bot commented Jan 5, 2021

TobiHartmann commented Jan 6, 2021

openjdk bot commented Jan 6, 2021

TobiHartmann commented Jan 6, 2021

navyxliu commented Jan 6, 2021 •

edited

Loading

navyxliu commented Jan 8, 2021

navyxliu commented Jan 15, 2021

navyxliu commented Jan 15, 2021

openjdk bot commented Jan 15, 2021

navyxliu commented Jan 15, 2021

TobiHartmann left a comment

vnkozlov left a comment

vnkozlov commented Jan 18, 2021

openjdk bot commented Jan 18, 2021

navyxliu commented Jan 18, 2021

8258961: move some fields of SafePointNode from public to protected #1899

8258961: move some fields of SafePointNode from public to protected #1899

Conversation

navyxliu commented Dec 28, 2020 • edited by openjdk bot Loading

Progress

Issue

Reviewers

Download

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 28, 2020

openjdk bot commented Dec 28, 2020

mlbridge bot commented Dec 28, 2020 • edited Loading

Webrevs

vnkozlov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

vnkozlov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

openjdk bot commented Jan 5, 2021 • edited Loading

navyxliu commented Jan 5, 2021

navyxliu commented Jan 5, 2021

openjdk bot commented Jan 5, 2021

TobiHartmann commented Jan 6, 2021

openjdk bot commented Jan 6, 2021

TobiHartmann commented Jan 6, 2021

navyxliu commented Jan 6, 2021 • edited Loading

navyxliu commented Jan 8, 2021

navyxliu commented Jan 15, 2021

navyxliu commented Jan 15, 2021

openjdk bot commented Jan 15, 2021

navyxliu commented Jan 15, 2021

TobiHartmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

vnkozlov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

vnkozlov commented Jan 18, 2021

openjdk bot commented Jan 18, 2021

navyxliu commented Jan 18, 2021

navyxliu commented Dec 28, 2020 •

edited by openjdk bot

Loading

mlbridge bot commented Dec 28, 2020 •

edited

Loading

openjdk bot commented Jan 5, 2021 •

edited

Loading

navyxliu commented Jan 6, 2021 •

edited

Loading