Skip to content

Conversation

@honkar-jdk
Copy link
Contributor

@honkar-jdk honkar-jdk commented Apr 29, 2024

For the following manual test, more instructions are added as to what to expect for "hide,iconify and show" vs "hide,iconify,show and restore" for clarity.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8329692: Add more details to FrameStateTest.java test instructions (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19008/head:pull/19008
$ git checkout pull/19008

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/19008
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19008/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 19008

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 19008

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19008.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 29, 2024

👋 Welcome back honkar! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 29, 2024

@honkar-jdk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8329692: Add more details to FrameStateTest.java test instructions

Reviewed-by: tr, azvegint

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 157 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 29, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 29, 2024

@honkar-jdk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • client

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Apr 29, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 29, 2024

Copy link
Contributor

@kumarabhi006 kumarabhi006 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since these lines are unchanged, can't add comments there.

  1. AT L155, space after = is missing.
    icontst =new CreateFrame(cbIconState.getState(), cbResize.getState());

  2. In CreateFrame constructor, calling pack() is redundant as frame size is set by setBounds(...) method.

  3. L24 to L31 may be removed. Consolidated summary can be defined in jtreg summary tag.

Copy link
Contributor

@TejeshR13 TejeshR13 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One observation is that, after the updates the size of whole test window is slightly increased in height where the second Frame which has options is out of the window frame. When the taskbar is at bottom nothing seems to be visible.
One option is to limit the instruction rows or to use PassFailJFrame.splitUI instead of PassFailJFrame.splitUIBottom (Offcourse in splitUI the second Frame occupies the whole screen length which is not required).

@honkar-jdk
Copy link
Contributor Author

honkar-jdk commented Apr 30, 2024

One observation is that, after the updates the size of whole test window is slightly increased in height where the second Frame which has options is out of the window frame. When the taskbar is at bottom nothing seems to be visible.
One option is to limit the instruction rows or to use PassFailJFrame.splitUI instead of PassFailJFrame.splitUIBottom (Offcourse in splitUI the second Frame occupies the whole screen length which is not required).

PassFailJFrame.splitUI is not a good option as it causes a lot of empty space in this case. I have reduced the log area instead.

.instructions(INSTRUCTIONS)
.testTimeOut(10)
.rows(25)
.rows(26)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
.rows(26)
.rows(27)

It doesn't fit on Linux without scrolling:
image

(the test is problem listed on Linux, but we can fix it now to avoid coming back to it later)

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label May 2, 2024
@honkar-jdk
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 2, 2024

Going to push as commit 6f98d8f.
Since your change was applied there have been 158 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label May 2, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this May 2, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels May 2, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 2, 2024

@honkar-jdk Pushed as commit 6f98d8f.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants