-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
JDK-8329692 : Add more details to FrameStateTest.java test instructions #19008
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back honkar! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@honkar-jdk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 157 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
@honkar-jdk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
kumarabhi006
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since these lines are unchanged, can't add comments there.
-
AT L155, space after
=is missing.
icontst =new CreateFrame(cbIconState.getState(), cbResize.getState()); -
In
CreateFrameconstructor, callingpack()is redundant as frame size is set bysetBounds(...)method. -
L24 to L31 may be removed. Consolidated summary can be defined in
jtreg summary tag.
TejeshR13
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One observation is that, after the updates the size of whole test window is slightly increased in height where the second Frame which has options is out of the window frame. When the taskbar is at bottom nothing seems to be visible.
One option is to limit the instruction rows or to use PassFailJFrame.splitUI instead of PassFailJFrame.splitUIBottom (Offcourse in splitUI the second Frame occupies the whole screen length which is not required).
PassFailJFrame.splitUI is not a good option as it causes a lot of empty space in this case. I have reduced the log area instead. |
| .instructions(INSTRUCTIONS) | ||
| .testTimeOut(10) | ||
| .rows(25) | ||
| .rows(26) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
|
/integrate |
|
Going to push as commit 6f98d8f.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
|
@honkar-jdk Pushed as commit 6f98d8f. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |

For the following manual test, more instructions are added as to what to expect for "hide,iconify and show" vs "hide,iconify,show and restore" for clarity.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19008/head:pull/19008$ git checkout pull/19008Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/19008$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19008/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 19008View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 19008Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19008.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment