Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8331402: G1: Remove is_active() calls in G1HRPrinter logging #19061

Conversation

tschatzl
Copy link
Contributor

@tschatzl tschatzl commented May 2, 2024

Hi all,

the is_active() call for the various G1HRPrinter methods is unnecessary as the log_trace() call will do the exact same check again anyway.

Testing: gha, local compilation

Based on #19058.

Hth,
Thomas


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8331402: G1: Remove is_active() calls in G1HRPrinter logging (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19061/head:pull/19061
$ git checkout pull/19061

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/19061
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19061/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 19061

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 19061

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19061.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

Thomas Schatzl added 2 commits May 2, 2024 13:10
 The HRPrinter does not have any member variables (static or non-static), so it can be made AllStatic.

I.e. there is no reason to have an instance variable around.

Testing: gha

Hth,
  Thomas
The is_active() call for the various G1HRPrinter methods is unnecessary as the log_trace() call will do the exact same check again anyway.

Hth,
  Thomas
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 2, 2024

👋 Welcome back tschatzl! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into pr/19058 will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 2, 2024

@tschatzl This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8331402: G1: Remove is_active() calls in G1HRPrinter logging

Reviewed-by: iwalulya, ayang, gli

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8331402 8331402: G1: Remove is_active() calls in G1HRPrinter logging May 2, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label May 2, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 2, 2024

@tschatzl The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-gc

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org label May 2, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented May 2, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@lgxbslgx lgxbslgx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@openjdk-notifier openjdk-notifier bot changed the base branch from pr/19058 to master May 3, 2024 12:07
@openjdk-notifier
Copy link

The parent pull request that this pull request depends on has now been integrated and the target branch of this pull request has been updated. This means that changes from the dependent pull request can start to show up as belonging to this pull request, which may be confusing for reviewers. To remedy this situation, simply merge the latest changes from the new target branch into this pull request by running commands similar to these in the local repository for your personal fork:

git checkout submit/8331402-g1hrprinter-remove-is_active
git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git master
git merge FETCH_HEAD
# if there are conflicts, follow the instructions given by git merge
git commit -m "Merge master"
git push

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label May 3, 2024
@tschatzl
Copy link
Contributor Author

tschatzl commented May 3, 2024

Thanks @albertnetymk @lgxbslgx @walulyai for your reviews

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 3, 2024

Going to push as commit 58ef9e4.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label May 3, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this May 3, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels May 3, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 3, 2024

@tschatzl Pushed as commit 58ef9e4.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@tschatzl tschatzl deleted the submit/8331402-g1hrprinter-remove-is_active branch May 3, 2024 12:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants