Skip to content

8331655: ClassFile API ClassCastException with verbose output of certain class files #19088

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

asotona
Copy link
Member

@asotona asotona commented May 3, 2024

Specifically corrupted constant pool of a class file can cause ClassCastException, when the entries are accessed by Class-File API in exact order.

This fix avoids the ClassCastException and throws ConstantPoolException instead.
Test is attached.

Please review.

Thanks,
Adam


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8331655: ClassFile API ClassCastException with verbose output of certain class files (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19088/head:pull/19088
$ git checkout pull/19088

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/19088
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19088/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 19088

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 19088

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19088.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 3, 2024

👋 Welcome back asotona! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 3, 2024

@asotona This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8331655: ClassFile API ClassCastException with verbose output of certain class files

Reviewed-by: psandoz

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • b33096f: 8295153: java/util/Base64/TestEncodingDecodingLength.java ran out of memory
  • cf2c80e: 8331582: Incorrect default Console provider comment
  • 77b7122: 8312104: Update java man pages to include new security category in -XshowSettings

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label May 3, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 3, 2024

@asotona The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label May 3, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented May 3, 2024

Webrevs

= new AbstractPoolEntry.Utf8EntryImpl(this, index, buffer, q + 2, readU2(q));
cp[index] = uinfo;
return uinfo;
if (tag == TAG_UTF8) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we call into the tag accepting entryByIndex? e.g.,

if (entryByIndex(index, TAG_UTF8) instanceof AbstractPoolEntry.Utf8EntryImpl utf8) {
  return ...
}
throw new ...

?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it is a good opportunity to reduce the code a bit.
Thanks!

Copy link
Member

@PaulSandoz PaulSandoz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label May 3, 2024
@asotona
Copy link
Member Author

asotona commented May 3, 2024

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 3, 2024

Going to push as commit c1a1645.
Since your change was applied there have been 4 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 36c9607: 8331591: sun.font.CharSequenceCodePointIterator is buggy and unused
  • b33096f: 8295153: java/util/Base64/TestEncodingDecodingLength.java ran out of memory
  • cf2c80e: 8331582: Incorrect default Console provider comment
  • 77b7122: 8312104: Update java man pages to include new security category in -XshowSettings

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label May 3, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this May 3, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels May 3, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 3, 2024

@asotona Pushed as commit c1a1645.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants