Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8329418: Replace pointers to tables with offsets in relocation bitmap #19107

Closed
wants to merge 13 commits into from

Conversation

matias9927
Copy link
Contributor

@matias9927 matias9927 commented May 6, 2024

The beginning of the RW region contains pointers to c++ vtables which are always located at a fixed offset from the shared base address at runtime. This offset can be calculated at dumptime and stored with the read-only tables at the top of the RO region. As a further improvement, all the pointers to RO tables are replaced with offsets as well.

These changes will reduce the number of pointers in the RW and RO regions and will allow for the relocation bitmap size optimizations to be more effective. Verified with tier 1-5 tests.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8329418: Replace pointers to tables with offsets in relocation bitmap (Sub-task - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19107/head:pull/19107
$ git checkout pull/19107

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/19107
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19107/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 19107

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 19107

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19107.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 6, 2024

👋 Welcome back matsaave! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 6, 2024

@matias9927 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8329418: Replace pointers to tables with offsets in relocation bitmap

Reviewed-by: cjplummer, iklam

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • d47a4e9: 8332008: Enable issuestitle check
  • 0bf7282: 8331231: containers/docker/TestContainerInfo.java fails
  • ffbdfff: 8331999: BasicDirectoryModel/LoaderThreadCount.java frequently fails on Windows in CI

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 6, 2024

@matias9927 The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot
  • serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org labels May 6, 2024
@matias9927 matias9927 marked this pull request as ready for review May 6, 2024 20:46
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label May 6, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented May 6, 2024

Webrevs

Address vtableInfoAddress = vtablesIndex.getAddressAt(i * addressSize); // = _index[i]
Address vtableAddress = vtableInfoAddress.addOffsetTo(addressSize); // = &_index[i]->_cloned_vtable[0]
long vtable_offset = vtablesIndex.getJLongAt(i * addressSize); // long offset = _index[i]
System.out.printf("Offset: %x\n", vtable_offset);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove printf().

// ...
// };
//
// The following loop compues the following
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since there are lot of comments after this point, maybe the wording should instead be "The loop below...". Also, should be "computes"

@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ public static void countProps(String[] propLines, int expectedCount, String cmdN
}
}
if (numProps != expectedCount) {
throw new RuntimeException("Wrong number of " + cmdName + " properties: " + numProps);
throw new RuntimeException("Wrong number of " + cmdName + " properties: " + numProps + " Expected: " + expectedCount);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it would be good to add parenthesis around the extra output you added.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was an accidental leftover from debugging, I didn't intend for this to be part of the change. I should revert this since it's beyond the scope of this change.

Copy link
Contributor

@plummercj plummercj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

SA changes look good. Thanks for taking care of this.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label May 7, 2024
Copy link
Member

@iklam iklam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. I will suggest making some clean up to improve the readability of the existing code.

src/hotspot/share/cds/archiveUtils.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/hotspot/share/cds/cppVtables.cpp Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@iklam iklam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Just one small nit.

src/hotspot/share/cds/serializeClosure.hpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@matias9927
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the reviews @plummercj and @iklam!
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 10, 2024

Going to push as commit a706ca4.
Since your change was applied there have been 4 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • a643d6c: 8331862: Remove split relocation info implementation
  • d47a4e9: 8332008: Enable issuestitle check
  • 0bf7282: 8331231: containers/docker/TestContainerInfo.java fails
  • ffbdfff: 8331999: BasicDirectoryModel/LoaderThreadCount.java frequently fails on Windows in CI

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label May 10, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this May 10, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels May 10, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 10, 2024

@matias9927 Pushed as commit a706ca4.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants