Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8333035: Parallel: Remove ParMarkBitMap::IterationStatus #19419

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

albertnetymk
Copy link
Member

@albertnetymk albertnetymk commented May 28, 2024

Trivial removing effectively dead code.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8333035: Parallel: Remove ParMarkBitMap::IterationStatus (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19419/head:pull/19419
$ git checkout pull/19419

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/19419
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19419/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 19419

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 19419

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19419.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 28, 2024

👋 Welcome back ayang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 28, 2024

@albertnetymk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8333035: Parallel: Remove ParMarkBitMap::IterationStatus

Reviewed-by: tschatzl

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8333035 8333035: Parallel: Remove ParMarkBitMap::IterationStatus May 28, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label May 28, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 28, 2024

@albertnetymk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-gc

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org label May 28, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented May 28, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@tschatzl tschatzl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm and trivail

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label May 28, 2024
@albertnetymk
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for review.

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 28, 2024

Going to push as commit 4754f05.
Since your change was applied there have been 5 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 87a06b6: 8325805: Compiler Implementation for Flexible Constructor Bodies (Second Preview)
  • e708d13: 8332064: Implementation of Structured Concurrency (Third Preview)
  • 7b52d0a: 8332265: RISC-V: Materialize pointers faster by using a temp register
  • aa4c83a: 8332505: JEP 457: ClassRemapper forgets to remap bootstrap method references
  • cabe337: 8331921: Hotspot assembler files should use common logic to setup exported functions

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label May 28, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this May 28, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels May 28, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 28, 2024

@albertnetymk Pushed as commit 4754f05.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@albertnetymk albertnetymk deleted the pgc-return-void branch May 28, 2024 14:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants