-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8333884: MemorySegment::reinterpret removes read-only property #19629
Conversation
/csr |
👋 Welcome back pminborg! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@minborg This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
@minborg has indicated that a compatibility and specification (CSR) request is needed for this pull request. @minborg please create a CSR request for issue JDK-8333884 with the correct fix version. This pull request cannot be integrated until the CSR request is approved. |
Webrevs
|
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/foreign/MemorySegment.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note that asSlice
methods also lacks a similar guarantee on read-only (but the impl works fine there)
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/foreign/MemorySegment.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Even though not mentioned in the original issue, we could add documentation for this here as well. Or maybe via https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8333886 ? |
Or a new issue - I'm fine with both approaches. Whatever requires less work. Since you are already adding these "if this segment is read-only... ", maybe it would be simpler to review as part of this PR? |
Thanks for fixing! |
@minborg this pull request can not be integrated into git checkout reinterpret-ro-state
git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git master
git merge FETCH_HEAD
# resolve conflicts and follow the instructions given by git merge
git commit -m "Merge master"
git push |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit 6f7f0f1.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
This PR proposes to retain the read-only state when any of the
MemorySegment::reinterpret
methods is called.Previously, the read-only state was lost and the returned
MemorySegment
was always writable regardless of the original segment's read-only state.Progress
Issues
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19629/head:pull/19629
$ git checkout pull/19629
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/19629
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19629/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 19629
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 19629
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19629.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment