Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8333884: MemorySegment::reinterpret removes read-only property #19629

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

minborg
Copy link
Contributor

@minborg minborg commented Jun 10, 2024

This PR proposes to retain the read-only state when any of the MemorySegment::reinterpret methods is called.

Previously, the read-only state was lost and the returned MemorySegment was always writable regardless of the original segment's read-only state.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change requires CSR request JDK-8333892 to be approved
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issues

  • JDK-8333884: MemorySegment::reinterpret removes read-only property (Bug - P3)(⚠️ The fixVersion in this issue is [23, 24] but the fixVersion in .jcheck/conf is 24, a new backport will be created when this pr is integrated.)
  • JDK-8333892: MemorySegment::reinterpret removes read-only property (CSR)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19629/head:pull/19629
$ git checkout pull/19629

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/19629
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19629/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 19629

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 19629

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19629.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@minborg
Copy link
Contributor Author

minborg commented Jun 10, 2024

/csr

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 10, 2024

👋 Welcome back pminborg! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 10, 2024

@minborg This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8333884: MemorySegment::reinterpret removes read-only property

Reviewed-by: jvernee, mcimadamore

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the master branch:

  • ff49f67: 8335775: Remove extraneous 's' in comment of rawmonitor.cpp test file

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added rfr Pull request is ready for review csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration labels Jun 10, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 10, 2024

@minborg has indicated that a compatibility and specification (CSR) request is needed for this pull request.

@minborg please create a CSR request for issue JDK-8333884 with the correct fix version. This pull request cannot be integrated until the CSR request is approved.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 10, 2024

@minborg The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Jun 10, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 10, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@mcimadamore mcimadamore left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note that asSlice methods also lacks a similar guarantee on read-only (but the impl works fine there)

@minborg
Copy link
Contributor Author

minborg commented Jun 10, 2024

Note that asSlice methods also lacks a similar guarantee on read-only (but the impl works fine there)

Even though not mentioned in the original issue, we could add documentation for this here as well. Or maybe via https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8333886 ?

@mcimadamore
Copy link
Contributor

Note that asSlice methods also lacks a similar guarantee on read-only (but the impl works fine there)

Even though not mentioned in the original issue, we could add documentation for this here as well. Or maybe via https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8333886 ?

Or a new issue - I'm fine with both approaches. Whatever requires less work. Since you are already adding these "if this segment is read-only... ", maybe it would be simpler to review as part of this PR?

@JornVernee
Copy link
Member

Thanks for fixing!

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 13, 2024

@minborg this pull request can not be integrated into master due to one or more merge conflicts. To resolve these merge conflicts and update this pull request you can run the following commands in the local repository for your personal fork:

git checkout reinterpret-ro-state
git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git master
git merge FETCH_HEAD
# resolve conflicts and follow the instructions given by git merge
git commit -m "Merge master"
git push

@openjdk openjdk bot added the merge-conflict Pull request has merge conflict with target branch label Jun 13, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration label Jun 27, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed merge-conflict Pull request has merge conflict with target branch labels Jul 5, 2024
@minborg
Copy link
Contributor Author

minborg commented Jul 6, 2024

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 6, 2024

Going to push as commit 6f7f0f1.
Since your change was applied there have been 3 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • b83766e: 8335632: jdk/jfr/api/consumer/streaming/TestJVMExit.java failed with "Process [...] is no longer alive"
  • 7efe160: 8335730: JFR: Clean up jdk.jfr
  • ff49f67: 8335775: Remove extraneous 's' in comment of rawmonitor.cpp test file

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jul 6, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jul 6, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jul 6, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 6, 2024

@minborg Pushed as commit 6f7f0f1.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants