-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8334567: [test] runtime/os/TestTracePageSizes move ppc handling #19793
Conversation
👋 Welcome back mbaesken! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@MBaesken This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 18 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay.
BTW, what is different about the smaps file on PPC? I would have thought that its format is the same across all linux architectures.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
Thanks for the reviews ! /integrate |
Going to push as commit 6a5cb0b.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
The handling of ppc in runtime/os/TestTracePageSizes should be moved to the test headers.
This is done for x86_64 too in one case, make it more consistent.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19793/head:pull/19793
$ git checkout pull/19793
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/19793
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19793/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 19793
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 19793
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19793.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment