8334570: Problem list gc/TestAlwaysPreTouchBehavior.java

[SoniaZaldana]

Hi all,

This PR addresses 8334570 problem listing gc/TestAlwaysPreTouchBehavior.java until the underlying issues are resolved.

Note that despite failures only showing up for some collectors (G1 on linux-ppc64le, ZSingleGen and the parallel collector on macos-aarch64), I am problem listing all collectors in case it has to do with underprovisioned machines leading to the errors trickling down to the other test cases.

Thanks,
Sonia

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8334570: Problem list gc/TestAlwaysPreTouchBehavior.java (Sub-task - P4)

Reviewers

• Albert Mingkun Yang (@albertnetymk - Reviewer)
• Thomas Schatzl (@tschatzl - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19794/head:pull/19794
$ git checkout pull/19794

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/19794
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19794/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 19794

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 19794

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19794.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back szaldana! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@SoniaZaldana This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8334570: Problem list gc/TestAlwaysPreTouchBehavior.java

Reviewed-by: ayang, tschatzl

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 4 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 78682fe: 8329288: Update Visual Studio visibility support for POSIX functions
• bcf4bb4: 8333344: JMX attaching of Subject does not work when security manager not allowed
• 856931d: 8304732: jdk/jfr/api/consumer/recordingstream/TestStop.java failed again with "Expected outer stream to have 3 events"
• 01ee424: 8294960: Convert java.base/java.lang.invoke package to use the Classfile API to generate lambdas and method handles

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@albertnetymk, @tschatzl) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

[openjdk]

@SoniaZaldana To determine the appropriate audience for reviewing this pull request, one or more labels corresponding to different subsystems will normally be applied automatically. However, no automatic labelling rule matches the changes in this pull request. In order to have an "RFR" email sent to the correct mailing list, you will need to add one or more applicable labels manually using the /label pull request command.

Applicable Labels

• build
• client
• compiler
• core-libs
• graal
• hotspot
• hotspot-compiler
• hotspot-gc
• hotspot-jfr
• hotspot-runtime
• i18n
• ide-support
• javadoc
• jdk
• jmx
• kulla
• net
• nio
• security
• serviceability
• shenandoah

[SoniaZaldana]

/label hotspot hotspot-gc

[openjdk]

@SoniaZaldana
The hotspot label was successfully added.

The hotspot-gc label was successfully added.

[tstuefe]

Can you please ignore this for generic-all?

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 01: Full - Incremental (74ce7dd3)
• 00: Full (06e67443)

[SoniaZaldana]

Can you please ignore this for generic-all?

Sure, I updated it.

[tschatzl]

lgtm and trivial.

[SoniaZaldana]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@SoniaZaldana
Your change (at version 74ce7dd) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

[dholmes-ora]

/sponsor

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit b211929.
Since your change was applied there have been 5 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 4e58d8c: 8309821: Link to hidden classes section in Class specification for Class::isHidden
• 78682fe: 8329288: Update Visual Studio visibility support for POSIX functions
• bcf4bb4: 8333344: JMX attaching of Subject does not work when security manager not allowed
• 856931d: 8304732: jdk/jfr/api/consumer/recordingstream/TestStop.java failed again with "Expected outer stream to have 3 events"
• 01ee424: 8294960: Convert java.base/java.lang.invoke package to use the Classfile API to generate lambdas and method handles

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@dholmes-ora @SoniaZaldana Pushed as commit b211929.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.