-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8253219: Epsilon: clean up unnecessary includes #198
Conversation
👋 Welcome back shade! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@shipilev The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request: When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an RFR email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the |
Webrevs
|
Mailing list message from Thomas Schatzl on hotspot-gc-dev: Hi, On 16.09.20 09:49, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
- in epsilonMonitoringSupport.cpp, the include for allocation.inline.hpp Looks good otherwise. I do not need a re-review for this change. Thomas |
@shipilev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. In addition to the automated checks, the change must also fulfill all project specific requirements After integration, the commit message will be:
Since the source branch of this PR was last updated there have been 4 commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid automatic rebasing, please merge ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Mailing list message from Aleksey Shipilev on hotspot-gc-dev: On 9/16/20 12:52 PM, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
Seems vice versa: allocation.hpp defines CHeapObj and needs to be included, and -- |
Mailing list message from Thomas Schatzl on hotspot-gc-dev: Hi, On 16.09.20 13:00, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
I tend to always prefer the .inline.hpp if available as something Looks good. Thomas |
Right. I do as crystal^W static analyzer guides: include only what is necessary. Integrating now. |
/integrate |
@shipilev Since your change was applied there have been 4 commits pushed to the
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. Pushed as commit f509eb0. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Static analysis shows a few #include statements in gc/epsilon that are not needed.
Testing: Linux x86_64 {release, fastdebug, slowdebug} x {+PCH, -PCH}
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Download
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/198/head:pull/198
$ git checkout pull/198