Skip to content

8259373: c1 and jvmci runtime code use ResetNoHandleMark incorrectly #1982

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

coleenp
Copy link
Contributor

@coleenp coleenp commented Jan 7, 2021

Please review this trivial change to the compiler runtime code. See CR for details. Tested with tier1-3.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8259373: c1 and jvmci runtime code use ResetNoHandleMark incorrectly

Reviewers

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/1982/head:pull/1982
$ git checkout pull/1982

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 7, 2021

👋 Welcome back coleenp! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jan 7, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 7, 2021

@coleenp The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Jan 7, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 7, 2021

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@vnkozlov vnkozlov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 7, 2021

@coleenp This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8259373: c1 and jvmci runtime code use ResetNoHandleMark incorrectly

Reviewed-by: kvn

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 12 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • d8ad630: 8258772: Some runtime/cds tests fail with +LogCompilation or +StressX
  • 4ce83f2: 8039278: console.sh failed Automatically with exit code 1
  • 2e99e28: 8213126: java/awt/Window/MainKeyWindow/TestMainKeyWindow.java time-out on mac10.13
  • 8530ef0: 8259375: JvmtiExport::jni_Get/SetField_probe calls do not need ResetNoHandleMark
  • f91f92d: 8259317: Remove JVM option BreakAtWarning
  • 3f9f86f: 8258484: AIX build fails in Harfbuzz with XLC 16.01.0000.0006
  • 1c33847: 8259067: bootclasspath append takes out object lock
  • 0e6de4e: 8259339: AllocateUninitializedArray C2 intrinsic fails with void.class input
  • 81c0624: 8259354: Fix race condition in AbstractEventStream.nextThreadName
  • 227f99d: 8233555: [TESTBUG] JRadioButton tests failing on MacoS
  • ... and 2 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/80544e4d5f402f67171eb5aca11897f1c5c3d431...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 7, 2021
@coleenp
Copy link
Contributor Author

coleenp commented Jan 7, 2021

Thanks Vladimir. Trivial too?

@vnkozlov
Copy link
Contributor

vnkozlov commented Jan 7, 2021

Thanks Vladimir. Trivial too?

Yes, trivial. What testing you did?

@coleenp
Copy link
Contributor Author

coleenp commented Jan 7, 2021

I ran tier1-3 testing on it. Does that test jvmciRuntime ? I thought it did.

@vnkozlov
Copy link
Contributor

vnkozlov commented Jan 7, 2021

Yes, JVMCI is tested in tier1.
Changes are good for push.

@coleenp
Copy link
Contributor Author

coleenp commented Jan 7, 2021

Thanks Vladimir!
/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 7, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 7, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 7, 2021

@coleenp Since your change was applied there have been 32 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 555641e: Merge
  • 4f914e2: 8249633: doclint reports missing javadoc for JavaFX property methods that have a property description
  • eef43be: 8251200: False positive messages about missing comments for serialization
  • f1bc4e0: 8259312: VerifyCACerts.java fails as soneraclass2ca cert will expire in 90 days
  • 4a5786b: 8259075: Update the copyright notice in the files generated by CLDR Converter tool
  • d25a1be: 8259224: (ann) getAnnotatedReceiverType should not parameterize owner(s) of statically nested classes
  • ad45678: 8258558: Revert changes for JDK-8252505 and related issues
  • e66187d: 8259032: MappedMemorySegmentImpl#makeMappedSegment() ignores Unmapper#pagePosition
  • 80110da: 8259007: This test printed a blank page
  • 554e60c: 8258989: JVM is failed to inline in jdk.internal.vm.vector.VectorSupport::convert
  • ... and 22 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/80544e4d5f402f67171eb5aca11897f1c5c3d431...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit b996ccc.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@coleenp coleenp deleted the resethandlemark branch January 7, 2021 23:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants