Skip to content

8334598: Default classlist in JDK is not deterministic after JDK-8293980 #19868

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

iklam
Copy link
Member

@iklam iklam commented Jun 24, 2024

More filtering is needed when building the default archive in the JDK: constant pool resolution when running the build.tools.classlist.HelloClasslist program is not deterministic (due to concurrency in core library classes). This could cause different values in the @cp lines in the classlist file. The benefit of pre-resolved constant pool entries is more visible for custom archives and not so much for the default archive in the JDK, so we disable this optimization for the default CDS archive, until we can find a way to make it deterministic.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8334598: Default classlist in JDK is not deterministic after JDK-8293980 (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19868/head:pull/19868
$ git checkout pull/19868

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/19868
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19868/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 19868

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 19868

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19868.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 24, 2024

👋 Welcome back iklam! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 24, 2024

@iklam This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8334598: Default classlist in JDK is not deterministic after JDK-8293980

Reviewed-by: ccheung, dholmes, stuefe, erikj

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 4 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • c30e040: 8331911: Reconsider locking for recently disarmed nmethods
  • 974dca8: 8334223: Make Arena MEMFLAGs immutable
  • e527e1c: 8334580: Deprecate no-arg constructor BasicSliderUI() for removal
  • 3a26bbc: 8185429: [macos] After a modal dialog is closed, no window becomes active

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 24, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 24, 2024

@iklam The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • build

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the build build-dev@openjdk.org label Jun 24, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 24, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@calvinccheung calvinccheung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jun 24, 2024
Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems reasonable. Thanks.

Copy link
Member

@tstuefe tstuefe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

@iklam
Copy link
Member Author

iklam commented Jun 25, 2024

Thanks @calvinccheung @dholmes-ora @tstuefe @erikj79 for the review.
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 25, 2024

Going to push as commit 7429c37.
Since your change was applied there have been 10 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 9c89f08: 8334421: assert(!oldbox->is_unbalanced()) failed: this should not be called for unbalanced region
  • 57f8b91: 8333658: NMT: Use an allocator with 4-byte pointers to save memory in NativeCallStackStorage
  • 6c67933: 8334899: Test runtime/cds/appcds/javaldr/ExceptionDuringDumpAtObjectsInitPhase.java failed after JDK-8306580
  • cae94b2: 8334397: RISC-V: verify perf of ReverseBytesS/US
  • 75a2afa: 8248981: Specify list of standard message digest and mgf algorithms for RSASSA-PSS signature
  • baafa66: 8334287: Man page update for jstatd deprecation
  • c30e040: 8331911: Reconsider locking for recently disarmed nmethods
  • 974dca8: 8334223: Make Arena MEMFLAGs immutable
  • e527e1c: 8334580: Deprecate no-arg constructor BasicSliderUI() for removal
  • 3a26bbc: 8185429: [macos] After a modal dialog is closed, no window becomes active

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jun 25, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jun 25, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jun 25, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 25, 2024

@iklam Pushed as commit 7429c37.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
build build-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants