Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8334629: [BACKOUT] PhaseIdealLoop::conditional_move is too conservative #19896

Conversation

TobiHartmann
Copy link
Member

@TobiHartmann TobiHartmann commented Jun 26, 2024

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit 933eabab from the openjdk/jdk repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Quan Anh Mai on 25 Jun 2024 and was reviewed by Emanuel Peter, Tobias Hartmann and Jasmine Karthikeyan.

Thanks!


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8334629: [BACKOUT] PhaseIdealLoop::conditional_move is too conservative (Sub-task - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19896/head:pull/19896
$ git checkout pull/19896

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/19896
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19896/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 19896

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 19896

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19896.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 26, 2024

👋 Welcome back thartmann! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into jdk23 will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 26, 2024

@TobiHartmann This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8334629: [BACKOUT] PhaseIdealLoop::conditional_move is too conservative

Reviewed-by: chagedorn, qamai

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the jdk23 branch:

  • d151050: 8334594: Generational ZGC: Deadlock after OopMap rewrites in 8331572

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the jdk23 branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the jdk23 branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 933eababf2b79586a911082af36fdcc41763c7b9 8334629: [BACKOUT] PhaseIdealLoop::conditional_move is too conservative Jun 26, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 26, 2024

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport clean rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jun 26, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 26, 2024

@TobiHartmann The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Jun 26, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 26, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@chhagedorn chhagedorn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jun 26, 2024
@TobiHartmann
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks Christian!

Copy link
Member

@merykitty merykitty left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot for creating the backport

@TobiHartmann
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks Quan Anh!

@TobiHartmann
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 26, 2024

Going to push as commit 2086b0f.
Since your change was applied there has been 1 commit pushed to the jdk23 branch:

  • d151050: 8334594: Generational ZGC: Deadlock after OopMap rewrites in 8331572

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jun 26, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jun 26, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jun 26, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 26, 2024

@TobiHartmann Pushed as commit 2086b0f.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants