8334481: [JVMCI] add LINK_TO_NATIVE to MethodHandleAccessProvider.IntrinsicMethod

[mur47x111]

This PR allows Graal to query if a method is a vmIntrinsics::_linkToNative intrinsic.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8334481: [JVMCI] add LINK_TO_NATIVE to MethodHandleAccessProvider.IntrinsicMethod (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

• Doug Simon (@dougxc - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/20118/head:pull/20118
$ git checkout pull/20118

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/20118
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/20118/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 20118

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 20118

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20118.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back yzheng! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@mur47x111 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8334481: [JVMCI] add LINK_TO_NATIVE to MethodHandleAccessProvider.IntrinsicMethod

Reviewed-by: dnsimon

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 4 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 66db715: 8335637: Add explicit non-null return value expectations to Object.toString()
• 7ab96c7: 8335409: Can't allocate and retain memory from resource area in frame::oops_interpreted_do oop closure after 8329665
• fb66716: 8331725: ubsan: pc may not always be the entry point for a VtableStub
• fb9a227: 8313909: [JVMCI] assert(cp->tag_at(index).is_unresolved_klass()) in lookupKlassInPool

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[openjdk]

@mur47x111 The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• graal
• hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[dougxc]

LGTM.

[mur47x111]

Thanks for the review! Rerun of the pre-submit tests succeeded.

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 242f113.
Since your change was applied there have been 4 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 66db715: 8335637: Add explicit non-null return value expectations to Object.toString()
• 7ab96c7: 8335409: Can't allocate and retain memory from resource area in frame::oops_interpreted_do oop closure after 8329665
• fb66716: 8331725: ubsan: pc may not always be the entry point for a VtableStub
• fb9a227: 8313909: [JVMCI] assert(cp->tag_at(index).is_unresolved_klass()) in lookupKlassInPool

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@mur47x111 Pushed as commit 242f113.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (62aa769d)