8334653: ISO 4217 Amendment 177 Update

[justin-curtis-lu]

Please review this PR, which is a backport of commit 86b0cf25 from the openjdk/jdk mainline branch.

This change incorporates the ISO 4217 Amendment 177 Update.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8334653: ISO 4217 Amendment 177 Update (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

• Naoto Sato (@naotoj - Reviewer)
• Iris Clark (@irisclark - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/20126/head:pull/20126
$ git checkout pull/20126

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/20126
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/20126/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 20126

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 20126

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20126.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back jlu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into jdk23 will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@justin-curtis-lu This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8334653: ISO 4217 Amendment 177 Update

Reviewed-by: naoto, iris

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 5 new commits pushed to the jdk23 branch:

• 06191ac: 8335935: Chained builders not sending transformed models to next transforms
• 9620b91: 8333884: MemorySegment::reinterpret removes read-only property
• e991c0f: 8335766: Switch case with pattern matching and guard clause compiles inconsistently
• 6720685: 8335966: Remove incorrect problem listing of java/lang/instrument/NativeMethodPrefixAgent.java in ProblemList-Virtual.txt
• 4aab58b: 8335637: Add explicit non-null return value expectations to Object.toString()

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the jdk23 branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the jdk23 branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[openjdk]

@justin-curtis-lu The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• core-libs
• i18n

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (b8dd4bd5)

[Kboxoxx]

Hi @Kboxoxx, thanks for making a comment in an OpenJDK project!

All comments and discussions in the OpenJDK Community must be made available under the OpenJDK Terms of Use. If you already are an OpenJDK Author, Committer or Reviewer, please click here to open a new issue so that we can record that fact. Please Use "Add GitHub user Kboxoxx" for the summary.

If you are not an OpenJDK Author, Committer or Reviewer, simply check the box below to accept the OpenJDK Terms of Use for your comments.

• I agree to the OpenJDK Terms of Use for all comments I make in a project in the OpenJDK GitHub organization.

Your comment will be automatically restored once you have accepted the OpenJDK Terms of Use.

[turbanoff]

Please review this PR, which is a backport of commit 86b0cf25 from the openjdk/jdk repository.

This message is kind of confusing. This PR is for openjdk/jdk repository too.

[justin-curtis-lu]

@turbanoff true, I adjusted the message to indicate the original commit is from mainline.

[justin-curtis-lu]

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 5162e1a.
Since your change was applied there have been 13 commits pushed to the jdk23 branch:

• 908d1e9: 8336259: Wrong link to stylesheet.css in JavaDoc API documentation
• fd38606: 8325369: @sealedGraph: Bad link to image for tag on nested classes
• a106e52: 8324841: PKCS11 tests still skip execution
• 52cd9bb: 8335820: java/lang/invoke/LFCaching/LFSingleThreadCachingTest.java fails due to IllegalArgumentException: hash must be nonzero
• 7cc50a1: 8334719: (se) Deferred close of SelectableChannel may result in a Selector doing the final close before concurrent I/O on channel has completed
• cfbfe4a: 8318106: Generated HTML for snippet does not always contain an id
• d1373a2: 8336036: Synthetic documentation for a record's equals is incorrect for floating-point types
• 0a9e3bf: 8334418: Update IANA Language Subtag Registry to Version 2024-06-14
• 06191ac: 8335935: Chained builders not sending transformed models to next transforms
• 9620b91: 8333884: MemorySegment::reinterpret removes read-only property
• ... and 3 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/5b9ecb178667e373a834b241b8f8c8a13cef3b4d...jdk23

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@justin-curtis-lu Pushed as commit 5162e1a.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.