-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
8336675: Remove UnixFileSystemProvider.checkPath in favor of UnixPath.toUnixPath #20155
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8336675: Remove UnixFileSystemProvider.checkPath in favor of UnixPath.toUnixPath #20155
Conversation
👋 Welcome back aturbanov! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@turbanoff This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 66 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
@turbanoff The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
BTW, after my changes, implementations of |
The other way around, meaning it would okay for newByteChannel to call newFileChannel. |
…toUnixPath newFileChannel and newByteChannel methods now contains exactly the same code. reuse one from another
Are you planning to create a JBS issue for this cleanup? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks OK to me, but please wait for another review from someone in this area.
Have relevant tier tests been run after this change?
I'm running the tests with the change because I don't know if Andrey is able to run tier2 on Linux/macOS (which are impacted by the change). Update: No issues with tier1 and tier2. |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit f5871df.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@turbanoff Pushed as commit f5871df. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Implementation of both methods is the same.
jdk/src/java.base/unix/classes/sun/nio/fs/UnixFileSystemProvider.java
Lines 129 to 135 in 9b6f6c5
jdk/src/java.base/unix/classes/sun/nio/fs/UnixPath.java
Lines 172 to 179 in 9b6f6c5
UnixPath.toUnixPath
is already used by UnixFileSystemProvider in multiple places. Two more usages shouldn't cause problems.Tested on linux x64
test/jdk/java/nio
+test/jdk/java/io
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/20155/head:pull/20155
$ git checkout pull/20155
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/20155
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/20155/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 20155
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 20155
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20155.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment