Skip to content

8336675: Remove UnixFileSystemProvider.checkPath in favor of UnixPath.toUnixPath #20155

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

turbanoff
Copy link
Member

@turbanoff turbanoff commented Jul 12, 2024

Implementation of both methods is the same.

UnixPath checkPath(Path obj) {
if (obj == null)
throw new NullPointerException();
if (!(obj instanceof UnixPath))
throw new ProviderMismatchException();
return (UnixPath)obj;
}

// Checks that the given file is a UnixPath
static UnixPath toUnixPath(Path obj) {
if (obj == null)
throw new NullPointerException();
if (!(obj instanceof UnixPath))
throw new ProviderMismatchException();
return (UnixPath)obj;
}

UnixPath.toUnixPath is already used by UnixFileSystemProvider in multiple places. Two more usages shouldn't cause problems.

Tested on linux x64 test/jdk/java/nio + test/jdk/java/io


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8336675: Remove UnixFileSystemProvider.checkPath in favor of UnixPath.toUnixPath (Enhancement - P5)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/20155/head:pull/20155
$ git checkout pull/20155

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/20155
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/20155/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 20155

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 20155

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20155.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 12, 2024

👋 Welcome back aturbanov! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 12, 2024

@turbanoff This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8336675: Remove UnixFileSystemProvider.checkPath in favor of UnixPath.toUnixPath

Reviewed-by: jpai, alanb, bpb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 66 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 02be7b8: 8334495: Use FFM instead of jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe in java.desktop font implementation
  • bbc79a5: 8333768: Minor doc updates to java.lang.{Float, Double}
  • 245c086: 8332600: javac uses record components source position during compilation
  • 5f7b007: 8336346: Fix -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant warnings in jvmciJavaClasses.cpp
  • 4a73ed4: 8330144: Revise os::free_memory()
  • 35df48e: 8335860: compiler/vectorization/TestFloat16VectorConvChain.java fails with non-standard AVX/SSE settings
  • 7bf5313: 8335480: Only deoptimize threads if needed when closing shared arena
  • 1b83bd9: 8336661: Parallel: Remove stacks_empty assert in PSScavenge::invoke
  • 72297d2: 8317720: RISC-V: Implement Adler32 intrinsic
  • 21a6cf8: 8336587: failure_handler lldb command times out on macosx-aarch64 core file
  • ... and 56 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/9b6f6c5c9dd6d0fbb056e8d84c3a0888a3320edf...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 12, 2024

@turbanoff The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • nio

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the nio nio-dev@openjdk.org label Jul 12, 2024
@turbanoff
Copy link
Member Author

turbanoff commented Jul 12, 2024

BTW, after my changes, implementations of sun.nio.fs.UnixFileSystemProvider#newFileChannel and sun.nio.fs.UnixFileSystemProvider#newByteChannel are now identical too. Should we just call newFileChannel from newByteChannel ?

@AlanBateman
Copy link
Contributor

BTW, after my changes, implementations of sun.nio.fs.UnixFileSystemProvider#newFileChannel and sun.nio.fs.UnixFileSystemProvider#newByteChannel are now identical too. Should we just call newFileChannel from newByteChannel ?

The other way around, meaning it would okay for newByteChannel to call newFileChannel.

…toUnixPath

newFileChannel and newByteChannel methods now contains exactly the same code.
reuse one from another
@AlanBateman
Copy link
Contributor

Are you planning to create a JBS issue for this cleanup?

@turbanoff turbanoff changed the title [PATCH] Remove UnixFileSystemProvider.checkPath in favor of UnixPath.toUnixPath 8336675: Remove UnixFileSystemProvider.checkPath in favor of UnixPath.toUnixPath Jul 17, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jul 17, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 17, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@jaikiran jaikiran left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks OK to me, but please wait for another review from someone in this area.
Have relevant tier tests been run after this change?

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jul 18, 2024
@AlanBateman
Copy link
Contributor

AlanBateman commented Jul 18, 2024

Have relevant tier tests been run after this change?

I'm running the tests with the change because I don't know if Andrey is able to run tier2 on Linux/macOS (which are impacted by the change).

Update: No issues with tier1 and tier2.

@turbanoff
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 19, 2024

Going to push as commit f5871df.
Since your change was applied there have been 72 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 902bada: 8234071: JTable.AUTO_RESIZE_LAST_COLUMN acts like AUTO_RESIZE_ALL_COLUMNS
  • 1b9270a: 8328723: IP Address error when client enables HTTPS endpoint check on server socket
  • 330e520: 8028127: Regtest java/security/Security/SynchronizedAccess.java is incorrect
  • 39f4476: 8334772: Change Class::signers to an explicit field
  • 902c2af: 8336585: BoundAttribute.readEntryList not type-safe
  • b44632a: 8336588: Ensure Transform downstream receives upstream start items only after downstream started
  • 02be7b8: 8334495: Use FFM instead of jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe in java.desktop font implementation
  • bbc79a5: 8333768: Minor doc updates to java.lang.{Float, Double}
  • 245c086: 8332600: javac uses record components source position during compilation
  • 5f7b007: 8336346: Fix -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant warnings in jvmciJavaClasses.cpp
  • ... and 62 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/9b6f6c5c9dd6d0fbb056e8d84c3a0888a3320edf...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jul 19, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jul 19, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jul 19, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 19, 2024

@turbanoff Pushed as commit f5871df.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated nio nio-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants