8259522: Apply java.io.Serial annotations in java.desktop #2020

mrserb · 2021-01-11T06:21:52Z

Please review the application of @java.io.Serial annotation (JDK-8202385) to types in the desktop module to enable stricter compile-time checking of serialization-related declarations.

This annotation can be applied to these methods in the module:

private void writeObject(java.io.ObjectOutputStream stream) throws IOException
private void readObject(java.io.ObjectInputStream stream) throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException
private void readObjectNoData() throws ObjectStreamException
ANY-ACCESS-MODIFIER Object writeReplace() throws ObjectStreamException
ANY-ACCESS-MODIFIER Object readResolve() throws ObjectStreamException
private static final ObjectStreamField[] serialPersistentFields
private static final long serialVersionUID

Notes:

I have tried to update the comments for serialVersionUID as accurately as possible, but mostly based on the source code history and bugs in JBS where that field was added
Some of the readObject/writeObject methods in the javax.swing package does not have a spec, because this package and some others are excluded from the serialization specification.

A similar fix was implemented for java.base module as well:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2019-August/062046.html

Progress

Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
Commit message must refer to an issue
Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

JDK-8259522: Apply java.io.Serial annotations in java.desktop

Reviewers

Alexey Ivanov (@aivanov-jdk - Reviewer) ⚠️ Review applies to 2e50a25
Prasanta Sadhukhan (@prsadhuk - Reviewer)

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/2020/head:pull/2020
$ git checkout pull/2020

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

bridgekeeper · 2021-01-11T06:22:32Z

👋 Welcome back serb! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

openjdk · 2021-01-11T06:23:28Z

@mrserb The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

2d
awt
beans
i18n
sound
swing

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

mlbridge · 2021-01-11T08:19:18Z

Webrevs

01: Full - Incremental (502c1a4)
00: Full (2e50a25)

aivanov-jdk · 2021-01-12T20:23:38Z

src/java.desktop/share/classes/com/sun/media/sound/InvalidDataException.java

+    /**
+     * Use serialVersionUID from JDK 1.7 for interoperability.
+     */
+    @Serial
    private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;


This is the standard wording, yet should it mention the serialization is between the same versions only because the value of serialVersionUID is not unique?

I think it is "quite" unique, the "1L" is used from the beginning. It is just different from the value which could be generated by the "serialver" but still should work fine.

Okay. There are several classes which extend this one, all of them use the same 1L value which makes it not "quite" unique.

Changing the values at this time presents more risks than benefits.

src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/image/RasterFormatException.java

src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/image/ImagingOpException.java

openjdk · 2021-01-12T20:24:20Z

@mrserb This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8259522: Apply java.io.Serial annotations in java.desktop

Reviewed-by: aivanov, psadhukhan

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 61 new commits pushed to the master branch:

a483869: 8225045: javax/swing/JInternalFrame/8146321/JInternalFrameIconTest.java fails on linux-x64
44c8379: 8256019: JLabel HTML text does not support translucent text colors
0957d9e: 8259519: The java.awt.datatransfer.DataFlavor#ioInputStreamClass field is redundant
65bed64: 8253635: Implement toString() for SSLEngineImpl
c6d798c: 8259629: aarch64 builds fail after JDK-8258932
4be2173: 8259319: Illegal package access when SunPKCS11 requires SunJCE's classes
e4df209: 7018932: Drawing very large coordinates with a dashed Stroke can cause Java to hang
5f7ccce: 8226810: Failed to launch JVM because of NullPointerException occured on System.props
d6a2105: 8259343: [macOS] Update JNI error handling in Cocoa code.
c338f11: 8259349: -XX:AvgMonitorsPerThreadEstimate=1 does not work right
... and 51 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/81db63e8d74c0d85cdadb0a70580a33c79d0bb80...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

…ption.java Co-authored-by: Aleksei Ivanov <70774172+aivanov-jdk@users.noreply.github.com>

…on.java Co-authored-by: Aleksei Ivanov <70774172+aivanov-jdk@users.noreply.github.com>

prsadhuk

Why do we add serialVersionUID in some classes like DefaultMutableTreeNode.java but not in other swing classes?
Also, if this change is for stricter compile-time checking, shouldn't we remove @SuppressWarnings("serial") check?

mrserb · 2021-01-13T07:05:27Z

Why do we add serialVersionUID in some classes like DefaultMutableTreeNode.java but not in other swing classes?

Most Swing classes are marked by the specific "Warning" that "Same-version serialization only" is supported. (I think such a warning is missed in a few classes). So generally the serialVersionUID field is not needed in such classes, but if present this provides a small benefit -> this UID is not generated at runtime.

For example, the DefaultMutableTreeNode was updated by the JDK-5017904 fix, which was unrelated to serialization but was targeted for the performance issue.

Also, if this change is for stricter compile-time checking, shouldn't we remove @SuppressWarnings("serial") check?

At some point, we probably can remove it but will need to fix all serialization warnings which were disabled.

mrserb · 2021-01-15T00:27:40Z

/integrate

openjdk · 2021-01-15T00:28:32Z

@mrserb Since your change was applied there have been 111 commits pushed to the master branch:

bf28f92: 8259713: Fix comments about ResetNoHandleMark in deoptimization
4f881ba: 8258652: Assert in JvmtiThreadState::cur_stack_depth() can noticeably slow down debugging single stepping
d18d26e: 8259350: Add some internal debugging APIs to the debug agent
a6b2162: 8259278: Optimize Vector API slice and unslice operations
da6bcf9: 8255019: Shenandoah: Split STW and concurrent mark into separate classes
aba3431: 8258956: Memory Leak in StringCoding on ThreadLocal resultCached StringCoding.Result
8554fe6: 8253866: Security Libs Terminology Refresh
c2a3c7e: 8259727: Remove redundant "target" arguments to methods in Links
1620664: 8259723: Move Table class to formats.html package
38a1201: 8258912: Remove JVM options CountJNICalls and CountJVMCalls
... and 101 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/81db63e8d74c0d85cdadb0a70580a33c79d0bb80...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit 978bed6.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

mrserb added 7 commits Jan 10, 2021

Update serialVersionUID

22b6d33

Update serialPersistentFields

3d66477

Update writeObject

eacf74a

Update readObject

1d28ada

Update writeReplace

fb64116

Update readResolve

d53d57e

Update TextAttribute.java

2e50a25

openjdk bot added 2d swing beans sound i18n awt labels Jan 11, 2021

mrserb marked this pull request as ready for review Jan 11, 2021

openjdk bot added the rfr label Jan 11, 2021

aivanov-jdk approved these changes Jan 12, 2021

View changes

openjdk bot added the ready label Jan 12, 2021

mrserb and others added 2 commits Jan 12, 2021

Update src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/image/RasterFormatExce…

d0e3850

…ption.java Co-authored-by: Aleksei Ivanov <70774172+aivanov-jdk@users.noreply.github.com>

Update src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/image/ImagingOpExcepti…

502c1a4

…on.java Co-authored-by: Aleksei Ivanov <70774172+aivanov-jdk@users.noreply.github.com>

prsadhuk reviewed Jan 13, 2021

View changes

prsadhuk approved these changes Jan 13, 2021

View changes

openjdk bot closed this Jan 15, 2021

openjdk bot added integrated and removed ready labels Jan 15, 2021

openjdk bot removed the rfr label Jan 15, 2021

mrserb deleted the JDK-8259522 branch Apr 12, 2021

openjdk / jdk Public

8259522: Apply java.io.Serial annotations in java.desktop #2020

8259522: Apply java.io.Serial annotations in java.desktop #2020

mrserb commented Jan 11, 2021 •

edited by openjdk bot

Loading

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 11, 2021

openjdk bot commented Jan 11, 2021

mlbridge bot commented Jan 11, 2021 •

edited

Loading

aivanov-jdk Jan 12, 2021

mrserb Jan 12, 2021

aivanov-jdk Jan 12, 2021

openjdk bot commented Jan 12, 2021 •

edited

Loading

prsadhuk left a comment

mrserb commented Jan 13, 2021

mrserb commented Jan 15, 2021

openjdk bot commented Jan 15, 2021

openjdk / jdk Public

8259522: Apply java.io.Serial annotations in java.desktop #2020

8259522: Apply java.io.Serial annotations in java.desktop #2020

Conversation

mrserb commented Jan 11, 2021 • edited by openjdk bot Loading

Progress

Issue

Reviewers

Download

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 11, 2021

openjdk bot commented Jan 11, 2021

mlbridge bot commented Jan 11, 2021 • edited Loading

Webrevs

aivanov-jdk Jan 12, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

mrserb Jan 12, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

aivanov-jdk Jan 12, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

openjdk bot commented Jan 12, 2021 • edited Loading

prsadhuk left a comment

mrserb commented Jan 13, 2021

mrserb commented Jan 15, 2021

openjdk bot commented Jan 15, 2021

mrserb commented Jan 11, 2021 •

edited by openjdk bot

Loading

mlbridge bot commented Jan 11, 2021 •

edited

Loading

openjdk bot commented Jan 12, 2021 •

edited

Loading