Skip to content

8339017: Make a couple of fields in DoubleByte static#20329

Closed
turbanoff wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:masterfrom
turbanoff:DoubleByte_static_fields
Closed

8339017: Make a couple of fields in DoubleByte static#20329
turbanoff wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:masterfrom
turbanoff:DoubleByte_static_fields

Conversation

@turbanoff
Copy link
Member

@turbanoff turbanoff commented Jul 25, 2024

3 fields in sun.nio.cs.DoubleByte.{Encoder,Decoder} could be made 'static':

  1. SS2
  2. SS3
  3. MAX_SINGLEBYTE

Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed (2 reviews required, with at least 1 Reviewer, 1 Author)

Issue

  • JDK-8339017: Make a couple of fields in DoubleByte static (Enhancement - P5)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/20329/head:pull/20329
$ git checkout pull/20329

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/20329
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/20329/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 20329

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 20329

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20329.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

3 fields in sun.nio.cs.DoubleByte.{Encoder,Decoder} could be made 'static':
1. SS2
2. SS3
3. MAX_SINGLEBYTE
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 25, 2024

👋 Welcome back aturbanov! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 25, 2024

@turbanoff This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8339017: Make a couple of fields in DoubleByte static

Reviewed-by: bpb, naoto

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 333 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 25, 2024

@turbanoff The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • nio

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the nio nio-dev@openjdk.org label Jul 25, 2024
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 22, 2024

@turbanoff This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

implements ArrayEncoder
{
protected final int MAX_SINGLEBYTE = 0xff;
protected static final int MAX_SINGLEBYTE = 0xff;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes it can be static.

@turbanoff turbanoff changed the title [PATCH] Make a couple of fields in DoubleByte static 8339017: Make a couple of fields in DoubleByte static Aug 26, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Aug 26, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Aug 26, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@bplb bplb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks all right but I think @naotoj might like to review it as well.

@bplb
Copy link
Member

bplb commented Aug 26, 2024

/reviewers 2

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Aug 26, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 26, 2024

@bplb
The total number of required reviews for this PR (including the jcheck configuration and the last /reviewers command) is now set to 2 (with at least 1 Reviewer, 1 Author).

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Aug 26, 2024
Copy link
Member

@naotoj naotoj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Aug 27, 2024
@turbanoff
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 29, 2024

Going to push as commit d35ffa4.
Since your change was applied there have been 359 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 723588a: 8338569: HTTP/1.1 CleanupTrigger may be triggerred after the next exchange started
  • 362f9ce: 8339120: Use more fine-granular gcc unused warnings
  • f080b4b: 8333098: ubsan: bytecodeInfo.cpp:318:59: runtime error: division by zero
  • ff59532: 8338678: Erroneous parameterized type represented as
  • 0b4a7d5: 8324859: Improve error recovery
  • 1383fec: 8327381: Refactor type-improving transformations in BoolNode::Ideal to BoolNode::Value
  • eb7ead5: 8336873: BasicSplitPaneDivider:oneTouchExpandableChanged() should mention that implementation depends on SplitPane.supportsOneTouchButtons property
  • 0ddcd70: 8335120: assert(!target->can_be_statically_bound() || target == cha_monomorphic_target) failed
  • 26e3d53: 8338716: Re-visit "interrupt handling" in jdk.internal.loader.Resource
  • 72a4900: 8338888: SystemDictionary::class_name_symbol has incorrect length check
  • ... and 349 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/3baff2af6a30cc6cb2e0d4391db1cf7e61c33f64...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Aug 29, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Aug 29, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Aug 29, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 29, 2024

@turbanoff Pushed as commit d35ffa4.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

integrated Pull request has been integrated nio nio-dev@openjdk.org

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants