-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8335181: Incorrect handling of HTTP/2 GOAWAY frames in HttpClient #20567
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…ntroller assertion
|
👋 Welcome back jpai! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@jaikiran This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 5 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Webrevs
|
dfuch
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
|
Thank you Daniel for the review. tier testing and test repeat testing came back fine without any failures. |
|
/integrate |
|
Going to push as commit 720b446.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
This is a fresh version of the PR that I had opened here #20442. A
git mergecommand ended up causing unexpected issues with that old PR.The commits in this PR are the ones which were already reviewed and a new one which was done to implement Daniel's suggestion in the review. test repeat 50 of java/net/httpclient had passed without any issues for that old PR. But before integrating this PR, I will rerun all relevant tests again to be sure nothing unexpected shows up.
Sorry that this has to be reviewed afresh.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/20567/head:pull/20567$ git checkout pull/20567Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/20567$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/20567/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 20567View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 20567Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20567.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment