Skip to content

8338564: Remove obsolete AbstractNamedEntry::equals method #20622

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

asotona
Copy link
Member

@asotona asotona commented Aug 19, 2024

Method jdk.internal.classfile.impl.AbstractPoolEntry.AbstractNamedEntry::equals implementation is invalid.
Fortunately it is overridden with valid implementation in all its sub types and it can be removed.

This patch removes the obsolete an invalid method implementation.

Please review.

Thanks,
Adam


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8338564: Remove obsolete AbstractNamedEntry::equals method (Bug - P5)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/20622/head:pull/20622
$ git checkout pull/20622

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/20622
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/20622/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 20622

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 20622

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20622.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 19, 2024

👋 Welcome back asotona! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 19, 2024

@asotona This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8338564: Remove obsolete AbstractNamedEntry::equals method

Reviewed-by: liach

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • e07a5b6: 8338512: JFR: Revert changes to TestCodeSweeper
  • 6d430f2: 8338314: JFR: Split JFRCheckpoint VM operation
  • f0374a0: 8337987: Relocate jfr and throw_exception stubs from StubGenerator to SharedRuntime

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Aug 19, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 19, 2024

@asotona The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Aug 19, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Aug 19, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@liach liach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Noticed this a while ago too :)

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Aug 19, 2024
@asotona
Copy link
Member Author

asotona commented Aug 19, 2024

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 19, 2024

Going to push as commit f0fe313.
Since your change was applied there have been 4 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 6ff6b09: 8290501: Typo in javax.swing.BoundedRangeModel documentation
  • e07a5b6: 8338512: JFR: Revert changes to TestCodeSweeper
  • 6d430f2: 8338314: JFR: Split JFRCheckpoint VM operation
  • f0374a0: 8337987: Relocate jfr and throw_exception stubs from StubGenerator to SharedRuntime

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Aug 19, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Aug 19, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Aug 19, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 19, 2024

@asotona Pushed as commit f0fe313.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants