-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
8338630: Test java/nio/channels/DatagramChannel/SendReceiveMaxSize.java timeout #20658
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Welcome back syan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@sendaoYan This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 21 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@djelinski, @dfuch, @jaikiran) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
@sendaoYan The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
/label remove core-libs |
@AlanBateman |
@AlanBateman |
Thanks. |
The GHA test runner report macos-aarch64 |
This looks good to me. Since I suggested the patch maybe someone else should officially approve? |
Looks OK to me. Should we be adding that check even within the |
I am not sure macos can have |
I'd rather avoid adding exceptions until it's proven necessary. I don't know if |
I think the name |
Thanks for the approved. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @sendaoYan, this looks OK to me. Given that this is changing a test library class and not just a specific test, I'm guessing you have run at least tier1, tier2 (and perhaps even tier3) with these changes?
Thanks for your reminding, I will verify this changes by full jtreg tests on linux x64 and linux aarch64. |
This PR has been verified by full jtreg tests(include tier1/tier2/tier3/tier4 etc.) on linux x64 and linux aarch64. |
@sendaoYan |
Thank you for running those tests. I ran tier1, tier2 and tier3 in our CI too with these changes and it looks fine. I'll go ahead and sponsor this now. |
/sponsor |
@jaikiran Only the author (@sendaoYan) is allowed to issue the |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit 8e0d019.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@jaikiran @sendaoYan Pushed as commit 8e0d019. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Thanks for the verified and sponsor. |
Hi,
On linux test environments which has docker service,
ifconfig
shows thatdocker0
appears to be a virtual ethernet bridge which is created by the docker host. And thedocker0
virtual ethernet bridge may cause testjava/nio/channels/DatagramChannel/SendReceiveMaxSize.java
binddocker0
ander network port.I think we should just skip "docker0" interfaces when looking for an IPv4 address for tests.
Change has been verified, test fix only, the risk is low.
Additional testing
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/20658/head:pull/20658
$ git checkout pull/20658
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/20658
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/20658/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 20658
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 20658
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20658.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment