8253866: Security Libs Terminology Refresh

[jnimeh]

This is the security libs portion of the effort to replace archaic/non-inclusive words with more neutral terms (see JDK-8253315 for details).

Here are the changes covering core libraries code and tests. Terms were changed as follows:

• blacklisted.certs -> blocked.certs (along with supporting make infrastructure and tests)
• master/slave in KRB5 -> primary/replica
• blacklist in other files -> deny list
• whitelist -> allow list

Addressing similar issues in upstream 3rd party code is out of scope of this PR. Such changes will be picked up from their upstream sources.

---

Progress

• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

• JDK-8253866: Security Libs Terminology Refresh

Reviewers

• Erik Joelsson (@erikj79 - Reviewer) ⚠️ Review applies to 9d44a9e
• Weijun Wang (@wangweij - Reviewer) ⚠️ Review applies to 9d44a9e
• Sean Mullan (@seanjmullan - Reviewer) ⚠️ Review applies to 9d44a9e

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/2074/head:pull/2074
$ git checkout pull/2074

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back jnimeh! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@jnimeh The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• build
• core-libs
• security

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 01: Full - Incremental (45492f5)
• 00: Full (9d44a9e)

[erikj79]

Build changes look good.

[openjdk]

@jnimeh This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8253866: Security Libs Terminology Refresh

Reviewed-by: erikj, weijun, mullan

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 34 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• c2a3c7e: 8259727: Remove redundant "target" arguments to methods in Links
• 1620664: 8259723: Move Table class to formats.html package
• 38a1201: 8258912: Remove JVM options CountJNICalls and CountJVMCalls
• be57cf1: 8226416: MonitorUsedDeflationThreshold can cause repeated async deflation requests
• c822eda: 8259699: Reduce char[] copying in URLEncoder.encode(String, Charset)
• ff3e6e4: 8259773: Incorrect encoding of AVX-512 kmovq instruction
• b8ef2ba: 8259563: The CPU model name is printed multiple times when using -Xlog:os+cpu
• b040a3d: 8259631: Reapply pattern match instanceof use in HttpClientImpl
• 3462f7a: 8256955: Move includes of events.hpp out of header files
• 8b8b1f9: 8259706: C2 compilation fails with assert(vtable_index == Method::invalid_vtable_index) failed: correct sentinel value
• ... and 24 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/ccdf171d7893a5f362a64996807d92509a24c67c...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[wangweij]

Code change looks fine to me.

[jnimeh]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@jnimeh Since your change was applied there have been 34 commits pushed to the master branch:

• c2a3c7e: 8259727: Remove redundant "target" arguments to methods in Links
• 1620664: 8259723: Move Table class to formats.html package
• 38a1201: 8258912: Remove JVM options CountJNICalls and CountJVMCalls
• be57cf1: 8226416: MonitorUsedDeflationThreshold can cause repeated async deflation requests
• c822eda: 8259699: Reduce char[] copying in URLEncoder.encode(String, Charset)
• ff3e6e4: 8259773: Incorrect encoding of AVX-512 kmovq instruction
• b8ef2ba: 8259563: The CPU model name is printed multiple times when using -Xlog:os+cpu
• b040a3d: 8259631: Reapply pattern match instanceof use in HttpClientImpl
• 3462f7a: 8256955: Move includes of events.hpp out of header files
• 8b8b1f9: 8259706: C2 compilation fails with assert(vtable_index == Method::invalid_vtable_index) failed: correct sentinel value
• ... and 24 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/ccdf171d7893a5f362a64996807d92509a24c67c...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit 8554fe6.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.