-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8259777: Incorrect predication condition generated by ADLC #2080
Conversation
👋 Welcome back jbhateja! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@jatin-bhateja The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
@jatin-bhateja This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 4 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Hi Vladimir, Please suggest if its ok to push this patch with one reviewer approval. |
Mailing list message from Vladimir Ivanov on hotspot-compiler-dev: The guideline is to wait around a day to give people a chance speak up. Best regards, On 14.01.2021 20:31, Jatin Bhateja wrote: |
/integrate |
@jatin-bhateja Since your change was applied there have been 28 commits pushed to the
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. Pushed as commit bcf20a0. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Please consider following instruction selection pattern:-
match(Set dst (VectorBlend (Binary src1 (AddVB src1 src2)) mask));
Currently, ADLC emits following predication check for src1 in matcher DFA.
/*src1*/(_kids[0]->_kids[0]->_leaf == _kids[1]->_kids[0]->_leaf)
src1 appears twice in the State tree corresponding to this pattern, first as the leaf of left child state of Binary node which is
left child state of VectorBlend and secondly as the leaf of left child of AddVB which is the right child state of Binary node.
Thus following is the correct predication check to test both the occurrences of src1.
/*src1*/(_kids[0]->_kids[0]->_leaf == _kids[0]->_kids[1]->_kids[0]->_leaf)
This patch does a minor re-organizes the predication generation algorithm to fix this issue.
Validated that there is no change in generated DFA for current X86 AD files with and without this patch since such instruction patterns do not exist in AD files currently.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Download
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/2080/head:pull/2080
$ git checkout pull/2080