8338891: HotSpotDiagnosticsMXBean missing @since tag

[kevinjwalls]

Trivial "since" tag addition in javadoc: since 1.6

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8338891: HotSpotDiagnosticsMXBean missing @since tag (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

• Alan Bateman (@AlanBateman - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/20823/head:pull/20823
$ git checkout pull/20823

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/20823
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/20823/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 20823

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 20823

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20823.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back kevinw! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@kevinjwalls This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8338891: HotSpotDiagnosticsMXBean missing @since tag

Reviewed-by: alanb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 2 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 0e6bb51: 8339063: [aarch64] Skip verify_sve_vector_length after native calls if SVE supports 128 bits VL only
• b1163bc: 8256211: assert fired in java/net/httpclient/DependentPromiseActionsTest (infrequent)

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[openjdk]

@kevinjwalls The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• jmx
• serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (d98047f5)

[kevinjwalls]

Thanks Alan!

[kevinjwalls]

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 288fa60.
Since your change was applied there have been 5 commits pushed to the master branch:

• dc4fd89: 8339359: RISC-V: Use auipc explicitly in far_jump and far_call macro assembler routines
• 3a88fd4: 8334724: C2: remove PhaseIdealLoop::cast_incr_before_loop()
• 62dad3a: 8339351: Remove duplicate line in FileMapHeader::print
• 0e6bb51: 8339063: [aarch64] Skip verify_sve_vector_length after native calls if SVE supports 128 bits VL only
• b1163bc: 8256211: assert fired in java/net/httpclient/DependentPromiseActionsTest (infrequent)

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@kevinjwalls Pushed as commit 288fa60.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

[plummercj]

Do we need to update the copyright for this?