Skip to content

8339399: ZGC: Remove unnecessary page reset when splitting pages #20824

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

jsikstro
Copy link
Member

@jsikstro jsikstro commented Sep 2, 2024

There is no use-case where it is necessary to reset the same page after splitting and thus the reset should be removed.

Tested with tiers 1-3.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8339399: ZGC: Remove unnecessary page reset when splitting pages (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/20824/head:pull/20824
$ git checkout pull/20824

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/20824
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/20824/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 20824

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 20824

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20824.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 2, 2024

👋 Welcome back jsikstro! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 2, 2024

@jsikstro This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8339399: ZGC: Remove unnecessary page reset when splitting pages

Reviewed-by: stefank, eosterlund, aboldtch

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 28 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • f2c992c: 8339300: CollectorPolicy.young_scaled_initial_ergo_vm gtest fails on ppc64 based platforms
  • 9a1024d: 8190329: [macos] Swing InterOp Platform.exit() crash
  • 5998f4b: 8308588: Unnecessary synchronized on GTKStyle#ICONS_MAP can be removed
  • 90f3f43: 8328877: [JNI] The JNI Specification needs to address the limitations of integer UTF-8 String lengths
  • bbb5161: 8337664: Distrust TLS server certificates issued after Oct 2024 and anchored by Entrust Root CAs
  • a22e932: 8337163: Improve SA error message when failing to attach to a core file
  • a7120e2: 8311993: Test serviceability/sa/UniqueVtableTest.java failed: duplicate vtables detected
  • 5ebdf2d: 8338708: Don't create/destroy debug agent cmdQueueLock for each connection
  • 130ac13: 8337265: Test static-libs build in GitHub Actions
  • cfec3ac: 8337317: serviceability/jvmti tests failed with FATAL ERROR in native method: Failed during the GetClassSignature call
  • ... and 18 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/03ba37e60ce08def6afd172efc1cdbbcc856c633...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@stefank, @fisk, @xmas92) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Sep 2, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 2, 2024

@jsikstro The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-gc

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org label Sep 2, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 2, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@stefank stefank left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 2, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@fisk fisk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

Copy link
Member

@xmas92 xmas92 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm.

@jsikstro
Copy link
Member Author

jsikstro commented Sep 4, 2024

Thank you for the reviews! @stefank @fisk @xmas92
/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Sep 4, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 4, 2024

@jsikstro
Your change (at version b6fee02) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@stefank
Copy link
Member

stefank commented Sep 4, 2024

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 4, 2024

Going to push as commit a618605.
Since your change was applied there have been 28 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • f2c992c: 8339300: CollectorPolicy.young_scaled_initial_ergo_vm gtest fails on ppc64 based platforms
  • 9a1024d: 8190329: [macos] Swing InterOp Platform.exit() crash
  • 5998f4b: 8308588: Unnecessary synchronized on GTKStyle#ICONS_MAP can be removed
  • 90f3f43: 8328877: [JNI] The JNI Specification needs to address the limitations of integer UTF-8 String lengths
  • bbb5161: 8337664: Distrust TLS server certificates issued after Oct 2024 and anchored by Entrust Root CAs
  • a22e932: 8337163: Improve SA error message when failing to attach to a core file
  • a7120e2: 8311993: Test serviceability/sa/UniqueVtableTest.java failed: duplicate vtables detected
  • 5ebdf2d: 8338708: Don't create/destroy debug agent cmdQueueLock for each connection
  • 130ac13: 8337265: Test static-libs build in GitHub Actions
  • cfec3ac: 8337317: serviceability/jvmti tests failed with FATAL ERROR in native method: Failed during the GetClassSignature call
  • ... and 18 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/03ba37e60ce08def6afd172efc1cdbbcc856c633...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Sep 4, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 4, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Sep 4, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 4, 2024

@stefank @jsikstro Pushed as commit a618605.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@jsikstro jsikstro deleted the JDK-8339399_page_split_resetting branch October 7, 2024 13:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants