Skip to content

8339960: GenShen: Fix inconsistencies in generational Shenandoah behavior #20974

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 23 commits into from

Conversation

kdnilsen
Copy link
Contributor

@kdnilsen kdnilsen commented Sep 12, 2024

This fixes some bugs found in recent code review and playback of an assertion failure.

See also openjdk/shenandoah#497


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8339960: GenShen: Fix inconsistencies in generational Shenandoah behavior (Bug - P4) ⚠️ Issue is already resolved. Consider making this a "backport pull request" by setting the PR title to Backport <hash> with the hash of the original commit. See Backports.

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/20974/head:pull/20974
$ git checkout pull/20974

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/20974
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/20974/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 20974

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 20974

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20974.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 12, 2024

👋 Welcome back kdnilsen! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 12, 2024

@kdnilsen This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8339960: GenShen: Fix inconsistencies in generational Shenandoah behavior

Reviewed-by: wkemper, rkennke

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 34 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 65b9aba: 8339769: Incorrect error message during startup if working directory does not exist
  • 1640bd2: 8340186: Shenandoah: Missing load_reference_barrier_phantom_narrow match in is_shenandoah_lrb_call
  • 996790c: 8339954: Print JVMCI names with the Compiler.{perfmap,codelist,CodeHeap_Analytics} diagnostic commands
  • e1ebeef: 8340131: Refactor internal makeHiddenClassDefiner to take option mask instead of Set
  • 05b9d47: 8340194: Replace usage of -ms with -Xms in LauncherCommon.gmk make file
  • 5459518: 8339627: Cleanup Unsafe.setMemory intrinsic code
  • a4eb9a0: 8339918: Remove checks for outdated -t -tm -Xfuture -checksource -cs -noasyncgc options from the launcher
  • 6be15c3: 8340012: [C2] assert(KlassEncodingMetaspaceMax > pd) failed: change encoding max if new encoding after 8338526
  • 4b79063: 8339842: Open source several AWT focus tests - series 2
  • dc00eb8: 8338912: CDS: Segmented roots array
  • ... and 24 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/81ff91ef27a6a856ae2c453a9a9b8333b91da3ab...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@earthling-amzn, @rkennke) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Sep 12, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 12, 2024

@kdnilsen The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-gc
  • shenandoah

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org shenandoah shenandoah-dev@openjdk.org labels Sep 12, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 12, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@earthling-amzn earthling-amzn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@kdnilsen kdnilsen changed the title 8339960: Shenandoah: Fix inconsistencies in generational Shenandoah behaviors 8339960: GenShen: Fix inconsistencies in generational Shenandoah behaviors Sep 13, 2024
@kdnilsen kdnilsen changed the title 8339960: GenShen: Fix inconsistencies in generational Shenandoah behaviors 8339960: GenShen: Fix inconsistencies in generational Shenandoah behavior Sep 13, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@rkennke rkennke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thanks!

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 16, 2024
@kdnilsen
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Sep 16, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 16, 2024

@kdnilsen
Your change (at version f1ba63f) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@ysramakrishna
Copy link
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 16, 2024

Going to push as commit 858b4f1.
Since your change was applied there have been 36 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 59407fa: 8310525: DynamicLauncher for JDP test needs to try harder to find a free port
  • 89759c8: 8321935: Define the term 'standard doclet'
  • 65b9aba: 8339769: Incorrect error message during startup if working directory does not exist
  • 1640bd2: 8340186: Shenandoah: Missing load_reference_barrier_phantom_narrow match in is_shenandoah_lrb_call
  • 996790c: 8339954: Print JVMCI names with the Compiler.{perfmap,codelist,CodeHeap_Analytics} diagnostic commands
  • e1ebeef: 8340131: Refactor internal makeHiddenClassDefiner to take option mask instead of Set
  • 05b9d47: 8340194: Replace usage of -ms with -Xms in LauncherCommon.gmk make file
  • 5459518: 8339627: Cleanup Unsafe.setMemory intrinsic code
  • a4eb9a0: 8339918: Remove checks for outdated -t -tm -Xfuture -checksource -cs -noasyncgc options from the launcher
  • 6be15c3: 8340012: [C2] assert(KlassEncodingMetaspaceMax > pd) failed: change encoding max if new encoding after 8338526
  • ... and 26 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/81ff91ef27a6a856ae2c453a9a9b8333b91da3ab...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Sep 16, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 16, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Sep 16, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 16, 2024

@ysramakrishna @kdnilsen Pushed as commit 858b4f1.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated shenandoah shenandoah-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants