8340105: Expose BitMap::print_on in release builds

[shipilev]

A small quality of life improvement. This irritates me often enough when I am looking at various bitmaps in release builds. BitMap::print_on is not available in release builds, and bitmaps in debug builds are sometimes different than the ones in release builds. This often forces me to do additional hack to expose it. I think it should just be available in release builds to begin with.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8340105: Expose BitMap::print_on in release builds (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

• Thomas Stuefe (@tstuefe - Reviewer)
• Stefan Karlsson (@stefank - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/20995/head:pull/20995
$ git checkout pull/20995

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/20995
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/20995/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 20995

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 20995

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20995.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back shade! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@shipilev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8340105: Expose BitMap::print_on in release builds

Reviewed-by: stuefe, stefank

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 27 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• bd44cf8: 8330302: strace004 can still fail
• 8a4ea09: 8336492: Regression in lambda serialization
• 358ff19: 8339727: Open source several AWT focus tests - series 1
• 0c36177: 8340089: Simplify SegmentBulkOperations::powerOfProperty
• bacd046: 8321010: RISC-V: C2 RoundVF
• 5709c37: 8340081: Test java/foreign/TestLinker.java failed failed: missing permission java.lang.foreign.native.threshold.power.fill
• b88ff9c: 8339849: Enumerate opto and C1 stubs, generate enums, names, fields and generator calls
• ae75ca0: 8314842: zgc/genzgc tests ignore vm flags
• 5e5942a: 8339794: Open source closed choice tests Azure Pipelines continuous integration (without running tests, for now) #1
• 81ff91e: 8339531: Improve performance of MemorySegment::mismatch
• ... and 17 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/d9fdf69c34c20e0f2d526c2f04450acb904c3e80...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[openjdk]

@shipilev The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (0d03833d)

[tstuefe]

Good.

[stefank]

Looks good.

[shipilev]

Thanks!

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 74add0e.
Since your change was applied there have been 41 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 0e0f10f: 8340102: Move assert-only loop in OopMapSort::sort under debug macro
• a0794e0: 8339639: Opensource few AWT PopupMenu tests
• a8f143c: 8306679: com/sun/jdi/InterruptHangTest.java asserts with -Xcomp -Dmain.wrapper=Virtual options
• c91fa27: 8339725: Concurrent GC crashed due to GetMethodDeclaringClass
• fa502ec: 8339943: Frame not disposed in java/awt/dnd/DropActionChangeTest.java
• fdfe503: 8335288: SunPKCS11 initialization will call C_GetMechanismInfo on unsupported mechanisms
• 3aa8338: 8340075: Autoconf bundle cannot run on read-only filesystem
• 37bf589: 8339847: Broken link to the dieharder distribution website in SplittableRandom
• 89c172a: 8340082: Use inline return tag in java.base
• 1a0a538: 8340120: Remove redundant code in SegmentBulkOperations::mismatch
• ... and 31 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/d9fdf69c34c20e0f2d526c2f04450acb904c3e80...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@shipilev Pushed as commit 74add0e.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.