New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8259849: Shenandoah: Rename store-val to IU-barrier #2104
Conversation
|
Webrevs
|
Some file's copyright year need to be updated. Otherwise, looks good.
@rkennke This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 22 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.
|
...except that GHA report these two tests have failed: |
Right. Those should be fixed now. Only remaining GHA failure is Windows: configure: error: Could not find a C compiler. Do you know what's up there? |
Known issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8259679 |
/integrate |
@rkennke Since your change was applied there have been 22 commits pushed to the
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. Pushed as commit e60c992. |
We named the IU barriers StoreValEnqueueBarrier and various similar variations of this. Instead of naming it after how it's implemented, we should name it after its purpose: support IU-marking. It also looks confusing to have enqueue_barrier() and similar stuff, where no barrier is actually enqueued.
The renaming was 100% mechanical.
Testing:
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Download
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/2104/head:pull/2104
$ git checkout pull/2104