Skip to content

Conversation

@xmas92
Copy link
Member

@xmas92 xmas92 commented Oct 8, 2024

This is the implementation task for JEP 490: ZGC: Remove the Non-Generational Mode. See the JEP for details. JDK-8335850


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change requires a JEP request to be targeted
  • Change must be properly reviewed (3 reviews required, with at least 1 Reviewer, 2 Authors)
  • Change requires CSR request JDK-8341693 to be approved

Issues

  • JDK-8341692: Implement JEP 490: ZGC: Remove the Non-Generational Mode (Sub-task - P4)
  • JDK-8335850: JEP 490: ZGC: Remove the Non-Generational Mode (JEP)
  • JDK-8341693: Implement JEP 490: ZGC: Remove the Non-Generational Mode (CSR)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21401/head:pull/21401
$ git checkout pull/21401

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/21401
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21401/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 21401

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 21401

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21401.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 8, 2024

👋 Welcome back aboldtch! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 8, 2024

@xmas92 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8341692: Implement JEP 490: ZGC: Remove the Non-Generational Mode

Reviewed-by: ihse, eosterlund, stefank, prr, cjplummer, dholmes

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 111 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 9003524: 8342588: Shenandoah: Pull shared closures together in one header
  • f7f5198: 8343186: hsdis build libopcodes and libbfd are not found
  • 63c19d3: 8341977: Replace predicate walking and cloning code for Loop Peeling with a predicate visitor
  • 158ae51: 8250659: Clarify in ParameterizedType.getRawType() doc that only Class is returned
  • b6f745d: 8342489: compiler/c2/irTests/TestVectorizationMismatchedAccess.java fails on big-endian platforms
  • bd79594: 8343037: Missing @SInCE tag on JColorChooser.showDialog overload
  • ceaa71e: 8342576: [macos] AppContentTest still fails after JDK-8341443 for same reason on older macOS versions
  • 40f3d50: 8343211: Compile error: redefinition of 'Assembler::evmovdquw(XMMRegister,KRegister,XMMRegister,bool,int)'
  • 60364ef: 8341273: JVMTI is not properly hiding some continuation related methods
  • 520ddac: 8331861: [PPC64] Implement load / store assembler functions which take an Address object
  • ... and 101 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/8bcd4920f1b03d0ef8e295e53557c629f05ceaa4...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration label Oct 8, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 8, 2024

@xmas92 The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • build
  • client
  • core-libs
  • graal
  • hotspot
  • serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added graal graal-dev@openjdk.org serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org build build-dev@openjdk.org client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org labels Oct 8, 2024
@xmas92 xmas92 marked this pull request as ready for review October 9, 2024 11:46
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 9, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 9, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@magicus magicus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Build changes look good.

Are you on a direct track towards winning over the title of Dr Deprecator? ;-)

/reviewers 3

@stefank
Copy link
Member

stefank commented Oct 9, 2024

Looks good to me!

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 9, 2024

@magicus
The total number of required reviews for this PR (including the jcheck configuration and the last /reviewers command) is now set to 3 (with at least 1 Reviewer, 2 Authors).

@liach
Copy link
Member

liach commented Oct 9, 2024

/jep jep-490

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 9, 2024

@liach
This pull request will not be integrated until the JEP-490 has been targeted.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the jep label Oct 9, 2024
@@ -521,7 +520,7 @@ static SpecialFlag const special_jvm_flags[] = {
// -------------- Obsolete Flags - sorted by expired_in --------------

{ "MetaspaceReclaimPolicy", JDK_Version::undefined(), JDK_Version::jdk(21), JDK_Version::undefined() },

{ "ZGenerational", JDK_Version::jdk(23), JDK_Version::jdk(24), JDK_Version::undefined() },
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FTR: This line depends on what version the JEP gets targeted to.

Copy link
Contributor

@fisk fisk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

Copy link
Contributor

@prrace prrace left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the 2D/AWT test changes are fine. I've not looked at anything else.

Added tag jdk-24+19 for changeset e7c5bf4
Copy link
Contributor

@plummercj plummercj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The serviceability related changes look good. I suppose the 6 or so SA bugs filed against the non-generational ZGC can be closed out. I have a note to myself to go through them and close if appropriate. We have JDK-8307393 filed for the lack of SA support for generational ZGC, and that is probably the only SA ZGC related issue we need to keep around.

Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I skimmed everything and it seems okay to me.

Thanks

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 16, 2024

@xmas92 this pull request can not be integrated into master due to one or more merge conflicts. To resolve these merge conflicts and update this pull request you can run the following commands in the local repository for your personal fork:

git checkout JDK-8341692
git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git master
git merge FETCH_HEAD
# resolve conflicts and follow the instructions given by git merge
git commit -m "Merge master"
git push

@openjdk openjdk bot added the merge-conflict Pull request has merge conflict with target branch label Oct 16, 2024
Added tag jdk-24+20 for changeset 7a64fbb
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the merge-conflict Pull request has merge conflict with target branch label Oct 18, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration jep labels Oct 29, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 30, 2024
@xmas92
Copy link
Member Author

xmas92 commented Oct 30, 2024

Thanks for the reviews.
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 30, 2024

Going to push as commit 821c514.
Since your change was applied there have been 112 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 0fe15d6: 8343040: Clean up references to JRE in the launcher code
  • 9003524: 8342588: Shenandoah: Pull shared closures together in one header
  • f7f5198: 8343186: hsdis build libopcodes and libbfd are not found
  • 63c19d3: 8341977: Replace predicate walking and cloning code for Loop Peeling with a predicate visitor
  • 158ae51: 8250659: Clarify in ParameterizedType.getRawType() doc that only Class is returned
  • b6f745d: 8342489: compiler/c2/irTests/TestVectorizationMismatchedAccess.java fails on big-endian platforms
  • bd79594: 8343037: Missing @SInCE tag on JColorChooser.showDialog overload
  • ceaa71e: 8342576: [macos] AppContentTest still fails after JDK-8341443 for same reason on older macOS versions
  • 40f3d50: 8343211: Compile error: redefinition of 'Assembler::evmovdquw(XMMRegister,KRegister,XMMRegister,bool,int)'
  • 60364ef: 8341273: JVMTI is not properly hiding some continuation related methods
  • ... and 102 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/8bcd4920f1b03d0ef8e295e53557c629f05ceaa4...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Oct 30, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 30, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 30, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 30, 2024

@xmas92 Pushed as commit 821c514.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

build build-dev@openjdk.org client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org graal graal-dev@openjdk.org hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants