-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
8342442: Static ACVP sample tests #21548
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Welcome back weijun! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@wangweij This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 4 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good to me. Only a few grammatical changes. Why the inclusion of SHA?
Thanks. Fixed. I would like to include as many algorithms as possible. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perhaps it would be good to rename "Launcher" to "ACVP_Launcher" or "ACVP_Test" so its functionality is more explicit. Otherwise looks good
I organized everything within a directory named |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The duplication in utilities (RandomSource and xeh(String) should be avoided.
Perhaps in the test library or a common utility class.
Do we have plans to add more tests in the future? I see test data for AES_GCM, HMAC-SHA*, RSA, among others at the github page. |
It's definitely better to add more, but that's not in my plan yet. We can discuss with the test team on how to cover more algorithms. |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit f400896.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
Here we have a launcher and several algorithm-specific tests. Users can populate "internalProjection.json" files generated by NIST's ACVP Server into the
data
directory and test them with the launcher.Currently, only SHA2, SHA3, ML-KEM, and ML-DSA are supported.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21548/head:pull/21548
$ git checkout pull/21548
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/21548
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21548/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 21548
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 21548
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21548.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment