Skip to content

Conversation

@sendaoYan
Copy link
Member

@sendaoYan sendaoYan commented Oct 21, 2024

Hi all,
Newly added test gc/shenandoah/compiler/TestLoadBypassesNullCheck.java fails The unlock option must precede 'StressGCM'. with release jdk build. This PR fix the test bug, only add -XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions to make test run passed by release jdk build.
The change has been verified locally with release/fastdebug/slowdebug on linux-x64. Test-fix only, no risk.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8342681: TestLoadBypassesNullCheck.java fails improperly specified VM option (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21609/head:pull/21609
$ git checkout pull/21609

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/21609
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21609/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 21609

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 21609

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21609.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 21, 2024

👋 Welcome back syan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 21, 2024

@sendaoYan This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8342681: TestLoadBypassesNullCheck.java fails improperly specified VM option

Reviewed-by: shade

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 11 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 51a7ff6: 8335271: Specify the MessageFormat ArgumentIndex Implementation Limit
  • 52d752c: 8339507: Test generation tool and gtest for testing APX encoding of extended gpr instructions
  • 37aa320: 8342376: More reliable OOM handling in ExceptionDuringDumpAtObjectsInitPhase test
  • 18bcbf7: 8341052: SHA-512 implementation using SHA-NI
  • 54a744b: 8340553: ZipEntry field validation does not take into account the size of a CEN header
  • 18b55ce: 8342653: Fix minor doc issues in AnnotatedElement
  • 153ad91: 8338126: C2 SuperWord: VectorCastF2HF / vcvtps2ph produces wrong results for vector length 2
  • 80ec552: 8328528: C2 should optimize long-typed parallel iv in an int counted loop
  • 330f2b5: 8342295: compiler/jvmci/TestJVMCISavedProperties.java fails due to garbage in output
  • 1f35748: 8342102: ZGC: Optimize copy constructors in ZPhysicalMemory
  • ... and 1 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/07f550b85a3910edd28d8761e2adfb8d6a1352f6...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 21, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 21, 2024

@sendaoYan The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-gc
  • shenandoah

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org shenandoah shenandoah-dev@openjdk.org labels Oct 21, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 21, 2024

Webrevs

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 21, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 21, 2024
Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 21, 2024
@sendaoYan
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for the review.

@sendaoYan
Copy link
Member Author

To make CI test less noisy, I will integrate right now, ignore the 24 hours rule. Test-fix only, no risk.
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 22, 2024

Going to push as commit 8bcd492.
Since your change was applied there have been 17 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 7133d1b: 8342609: jpackage test helper function incorrectly removes a directory instead of its contents only
  • 8276a41: 8342715: x86 unused orw instruction encoding could be removed
  • 5a4b180: 8342011: Conditionally compile ReservedHeapSpace compressed heap support
  • e0c6480: 8338570: sun/font/HBShaper - mismatch in return type of FFM upcall function description and native invocation
  • 7158322: 8340477: Remove JDK1.1 compatible behavior for "EST", "MST", and "HST" time zones
  • 97c9212: 8342698: Fix order of @param tags in module java.base
  • 51a7ff6: 8335271: Specify the MessageFormat ArgumentIndex Implementation Limit
  • 52d752c: 8339507: Test generation tool and gtest for testing APX encoding of extended gpr instructions
  • 37aa320: 8342376: More reliable OOM handling in ExceptionDuringDumpAtObjectsInitPhase test
  • 18bcbf7: 8341052: SHA-512 implementation using SHA-NI
  • ... and 7 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/07f550b85a3910edd28d8761e2adfb8d6a1352f6...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Oct 22, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 22, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 22, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 22, 2024

@sendaoYan Pushed as commit 8bcd492.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@sendaoYan sendaoYan deleted the jbs8342681 branch October 22, 2024 02:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated shenandoah shenandoah-dev@openjdk.org

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants