-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8283664: Remove jtreg tag manual=yesno for java/awt/print/PrinterJob/PrintTextTest.java #21716
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back gredler! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@gredler This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 183 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@honkar-jdk, @aivanov-jdk, @turbanoff) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
Webrevs
|
honkar-jdk
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the manual test verified on all platforms?
This bug (JDK-8283664) only covers getting the test back to a runnable state. There is a separate entry (JDK-8148334) for fixing bugs exposed by this test which have not yet been fixed. I did verify that the bugs documented in JDK-8148334 do still exhibit -- so JDK-8148334 should remain open for now. |
|
@honkar-jdk I've made the requested changes, is there anything else that should be addressed? @prrace Would you be able to provide the second review for this PR? |
The test may need to be problem-listed against 8148334 as it's known to fail. |
Should that be part of this PR? If so, do I just add this line to
|
I think it should. We know the test fails because the printed version differs from the displayed one, there's a bug to track it. Thus, the test should be in the problem list. Perhaps, the only reason it isn't PL'ed is because the test couldn't be run. The PL entry line looks good to me. |
aivanov-jdk
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me.
The only things left are problem-listing and updating the switch statement.
Thanks again for the review, these last points should now be resolved. |
aivanov-jdk
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me.
Thank you.
|
@honkar-jdk Can you approve the PR if there are no further issues from your point of view? Thanks! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@gredler Changes LGTM.
Updated JDK-8148334 OS field to "generic" since the issue is observed on multiple platforms and to match the problemlist entry.
|
/integrate |
|
/integrate |
|
@gredler This pull request has not yet been marked as ready for integration. |
aivanov-jdk
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see you've handled nearly all formatting issues, therefore you should resolve the remaining ones too.
|
/integrate |
|
@honkar-jdk I think this one is ready to go, could you sponsor it? |
|
/sponsor |
|
Going to push as commit 84c99fb.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
|
@honkar-jdk @gredler Pushed as commit 84c99fb. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
There are multiple issue with this test case
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21716/head:pull/21716$ git checkout pull/21716Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/21716$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21716/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 21716View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 21716Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21716.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment