Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8346036: Unnecessary Hashtable usage in javax.swing.text.html.parser.Entity #21831

Closed

Conversation

turbanoff
Copy link
Member

@turbanoff turbanoff commented Nov 1, 2024

The Hashtable javax.swing.text.html.parser.Entity#entityTypes is modified only within <clinit> block.
We can replace it with immutable map to avoid Hashtable synchronization overhead.
Similar to what we did in #21825.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8346036: Unnecessary Hashtable usage in javax.swing.text.html.parser.Entity (Enhancement - P5)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21831/head:pull/21831
$ git checkout pull/21831

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/21831
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21831/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 21831

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 21831

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21831.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 1, 2024

👋 Welcome back aturbanov! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 1, 2024

@turbanoff This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8346036: Unnecessary Hashtable usage in javax.swing.text.html.parser.Entity

Reviewed-by: aivanov, azvegint

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 966 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • a641932: 8346310: Duplicate !HAS_PENDING_EXCEPTION check in DynamicArchive::dump_at_exit
  • 49ee4df: 8166983: Remove old/legacy unused tzdata files
  • 3fe0818: 8346099: JFR: Query for 'jfr view' can't handle wildcard with multiple event types
  • 55bcf4c: 8346047: JFR: Incorrect percentile value in 'jfr view'
  • ae3fc46: 8345580: Remove const from Node::_idx which is modified
  • 4d18e5a: 8346872: tools/jpackage/windows/WinLongPathTest.java fails
  • 92ad8a1: 8346052: JFR: Incorrect average value in 'jfr view'
  • 672c413: 8345337: JFR: jfr view should display all direct subfields for an event type
  • afe5434: 8347163: Javadoc error in ConstantPoolBuilder after JDK-8342468
  • f696d9c: 8346239: Improve memory efficiency of JimageDiffGenerator
  • ... and 956 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/751a914b0a377d4e1dd30d2501f0ab4e327dea34...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 1, 2024

@turbanoff The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • client

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Nov 1, 2024
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 29, 2024

@turbanoff This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@turbanoff turbanoff changed the title [PATCH] Unnecessary Hashtable usage in javax.swing.text.html.parser.Entity 8346036: Unnecessary Hashtable usage in javax.swing.text.html.parser.Entity Dec 11, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 11, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Webrevs

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 27, 2024

@turbanoff This pull request has been inactive for more than 8 weeks and will now be automatically closed. If you would like to continue working on this pull request in the future, feel free to reopen it! This can be done using the /open pull request command.

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot closed this Dec 27, 2024
Copy link
Member

@aivanov-jdk aivanov-jdk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me. It aligns javax.swing.text.html.parser.Entity to javax.swing.text.html.parser.Element which you did in #21825.

@turbanoff Could you re-open the issue?
I'll run the tests with this change in our CI.

@turbanoff
Copy link
Member Author

/open

@openjdk openjdk bot reopened this Jan 3, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 3, 2025

@turbanoff This pull request is now open

Copy link
Member

@aivanov-jdk aivanov-jdk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

All the client tests are green.

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/*
* Copyright (c) 1998, 2018, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 1998, 2024, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Needs to be updated to 2025?

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Leaving this as‑is is probably fine given that this PR hasn’t changed since then, just like #22854 (review) (commit 9a60f44)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The PR will be or is integrated in 2025, so the entire changeset is dated 2025 — thus, 2025 copyright year applies to all the files.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 7, 2025
@turbanoff
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you for review!
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Going to push as commit 9c72ded.
Since your change was applied there have been 987 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jan 9, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 9, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 9, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 9, 2025

@turbanoff Pushed as commit 9c72ded.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants